ATI GameCube GPU vs Radeon R9 M295X

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking382not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.72no data
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Rage 5 (2000)
GPU code nameAmethystFlipper
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date23 November 2014 (10 years ago)24 August 2000 (24 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048no data
Core clock speed723 MHz162 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million51 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate92.540.65
Floating-point processing power2.961 TFLOPSno data
ROPs324
TMUs1284

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)IGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeNot ListedSDR
Maximum RAM amount0 MB16 MB
Memory bus widthNot Listed64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data162 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s1.296 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXNot Listed6.0+
Shader Model6.3no data
OpenGL4.4N/A
OpenCLNot ListedN/A
Vulkan-N/A
Mantle+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 November 2014 24 August 2000
Chip lithography 28 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 45 Watt

R9 M295X has an age advantage of 14 years, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

ATI GameCube GPU, on the other hand, has 455.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 M295X and GameCube GPU. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 M295X
Radeon R9 M295X
ATI GameCube GPU
GameCube GPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 17 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M295X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 31 vote

Rate GameCube GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.