Radeon R9 M390 vs R9 M290X

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 M290X and Radeon R9 M390, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

R9 M290X
2014
4 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
8.44

R9 M390 outperforms R9 M290X by a moderate 19% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking494444
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.84no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)GCN (2012−2015)
GPU code nameNeptunePitcairn
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date9 January 2014 (10 years ago)9 June 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12801024
Compute units20no data
Core clock speed850 MHzno data
Boost clock speed900 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,800 million5000 Million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Wattno data
Texture fill rate72.00no data
Floating-point processing power2.304 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs80no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
Bus supportPCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1200 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth153.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data
Eyefinity++

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync++
HD3D++
PowerTune++
DualGraphics++
ZeroCore++
Switchable graphics++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 11DirectX® 12
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.44.4
OpenCLNot ListedNot Listed
Mantle++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 M290X 8.44
R9 M390 10.05
+19.1%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

R9 M290X 6817
R9 M390 6819
+0%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD44
+12.8%
39
−12.8%
4K16−18
−31.3%
21
+31.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−15.4%
14−16
+15.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−14.3%
24−27
+14.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
−25%
14−16
+25%
Battlefield 5 24−27
−19.2%
30−35
+19.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
−17.6%
20−22
+17.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−15.4%
14−16
+15.4%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−21.1%
21−24
+21.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−16.7%
27−30
+16.7%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−17.9%
65−70
+17.9%
Hitman 3 16−18
−18.8%
18−20
+18.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
−12.5%
50−55
+12.5%
Metro Exodus 24−27
−19.2%
30−35
+19.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
−17.4%
27−30
+17.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
−14.3%
30−35
+14.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
−8.6%
60−65
+8.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−14.3%
24−27
+14.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
−25%
14−16
+25%
Battlefield 5 24−27
−19.2%
30−35
+19.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
−17.6%
20−22
+17.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−15.4%
14−16
+15.4%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−21.1%
21−24
+21.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−16.7%
27−30
+16.7%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−17.9%
65−70
+17.9%
Hitman 3 16−18
−18.8%
18−20
+18.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
−12.5%
50−55
+12.5%
Metro Exodus 24−27
−19.2%
30−35
+19.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
−17.4%
27−30
+17.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
−14.3%
30−35
+14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−12.5%
27−30
+12.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
−8.6%
60−65
+8.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−14.3%
24−27
+14.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
−25%
14−16
+25%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
−17.6%
20−22
+17.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−15.4%
14−16
+15.4%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−21.1%
21−24
+21.1%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−17.9%
65−70
+17.9%
Hitman 3 16−18
−18.8%
18−20
+18.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
−12.5%
50−55
+12.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
−14.3%
30−35
+14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+33.3%
18
−33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
−8.6%
60−65
+8.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
−17.4%
27−30
+17.4%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
−18.8%
18−20
+18.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−15.4%
14−16
+15.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−10%
10−12
+10%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−29.4%
40−45
+29.4%
Hitman 3 12−14
−8.3%
12−14
+8.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−11.1%
20−22
+11.1%
Metro Exodus 10−12
−27.3%
14−16
+27.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−44.4%
12−14
+44.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−16.7%
60−65
+16.7%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−14.3%
16−18
+14.3%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Hitman 3 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−31.3%
40−45
+31.3%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−140%
12
+140%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%

This is how R9 M290X and R9 M390 compete in popular games:

  • R9 M290X is 13% faster in 1080p
  • R9 M390 is 31% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the R9 M290X is 33% faster.
  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the R9 M390 is 140% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • R9 M290X is ahead in 1 test (1%)
  • R9 M390 is ahead in 69 tests (96%)
  • there's a draw in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.44 10.05
Recency 9 January 2014 9 June 2015
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB

R9 M290X has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

R9 M390, on the other hand, has a 19.1% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 year.

The Radeon R9 M390 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 M290X in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 M290X
Radeon R9 M290X
AMD Radeon R9 M390
Radeon R9 M390

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 12 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M290X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 13 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M390 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.