RTX A1000 Mobile vs Radeon R9 380

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 380 with RTX A1000 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

R9 380
2015
4 GB GDDR5, 190 Watt
15.89

RTX A1000 Mobile outperforms R9 380 by an impressive 56% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking342224
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation9.07no data
Power efficiency5.7628.51
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameAntiguaGA107
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Designreferenceno data
Release date18 June 2015 (9 years ago)30 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17922048
Compute units28no data
Core clock speedno data630 MHz
Boost clock speed970 MHz1140 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)190 Watt60 Watt
Texture fill rate108.672.96
Floating-point processing power3.476 TFLOPS4.669 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs11264
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length221 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Form factorfull height / full length / dual slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2 x 6-pinno data
Bridgeless CrossFire+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
High bandwidth memory (HBM)-no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed970 MHz1375 MHz
Memory bandwidth182.4 GB/s176.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent
Eyefinity+-
Number of Eyefinity displays6no data
HDMI+-
DisplayPort support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire+-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
LiquidVR+-
PowerTune+-
TrueAudio+-
ZeroCore+-
VCE+-
DDMA audio+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.36.7
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan+1.3
Mantle+-
CUDA-8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 380 15.89
RTX A1000 Mobile 24.85
+56.4%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R9 380 6110
RTX A1000 Mobile 9552
+56.3%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

R9 380 12191
RTX A1000 Mobile 15135
+24.1%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

R9 380 29722
RTX A1000 Mobile 58312
+96.2%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

R9 380 8218
RTX A1000 Mobile 11321
+37.8%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

R9 380 50723
RTX A1000 Mobile 70880
+39.7%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD65
−3.1%
67
+3.1%
1440p16−18
−68.8%
27
+68.8%
4K27
−48.1%
40−45
+48.1%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.06no data
1440p12.44no data
4K7.37no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 27−30
−136%
66
+136%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−96.8%
61
+96.8%
Elden Ring 45−50
−22.4%
60
+22.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
−49%
75−80
+49%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
−78.6%
50
+78.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+24%
25
−24%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−67.7%
109
+67.7%
Metro Exodus 40−45
−51.2%
65−70
+51.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
−42.1%
50−55
+42.1%
Valorant 60−65
−56.3%
100−105
+56.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
−49%
75−80
+49%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
−50%
42
+50%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+72.2%
18
−72.2%
Dota 2 55−60
−71.9%
98
+71.9%
Elden Ring 45−50
−65.3%
80−85
+65.3%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−29.8%
74
+29.8%
Fortnite 85−90
−42%
120−130
+42%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−33.8%
87
+33.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 55−60
−59.6%
91
+59.6%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+169%
16
−169%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
−38.1%
150−160
+38.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
−42.1%
50−55
+42.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 52
−53.8%
80−85
+53.8%
Valorant 60−65
−56.3%
100−105
+56.3%
World of Tanks 200−210
−27.9%
250−260
+27.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
−49%
75−80
+49%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
−25%
35
+25%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+107%
15
−107%
Dota 2 55−60
−132%
132
+132%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−33.3%
75−80
+33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−16.9%
76
+16.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
−38.1%
150−160
+38.1%
Valorant 60−65
−56.3%
100−105
+56.3%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 21−24
−78.3%
40−45
+78.3%
Elden Ring 24−27
−76%
40−45
+76%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
−75%
40−45
+75%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
−19%
170−180
+19%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−64.3%
21−24
+64.3%
World of Tanks 110−120
−47.7%
160−170
+47.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
−56.3%
50−55
+56.3%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−50%
21−24
+50%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−75%
21−24
+75%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−84.6%
70−75
+84.6%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−69.2%
65−70
+69.2%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−62.9%
55−60
+62.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
−80%
35−40
+80%
Valorant 40−45
−67.5%
65−70
+67.5%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−100%
21−24
+100%
Dota 2 27−30
−59.3%
40−45
+59.3%
Elden Ring 10−12
−81.8%
20−22
+81.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
−59.3%
40−45
+59.3%
Metro Exodus 10−12
−72.7%
18−20
+72.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
−61.7%
75−80
+61.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
−60%
16−18
+60%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−59.3%
40−45
+59.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
−73.3%
24−27
+73.3%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−100%
21−24
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−100%
8−9
+100%
Dota 2 27−30
−59.3%
40−45
+59.3%
Far Cry 5 20−22
−65%
30−35
+65%
Fortnite 18−20
−72.2%
30−35
+72.2%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−65.2%
35−40
+65.2%
Valorant 18−20
−77.8%
30−35
+77.8%

This is how R9 380 and RTX A1000 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX A1000 Mobile is 3% faster in 1080p
  • RTX A1000 Mobile is 69% faster in 1440p
  • RTX A1000 Mobile is 48% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the R9 380 is 169% faster.
  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the RTX A1000 Mobile is 136% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • R9 380 is ahead in 4 tests (6%)
  • RTX A1000 Mobile is ahead in 59 tests (94%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.89 24.85
Recency 18 June 2015 30 March 2022
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 190 Watt 60 Watt

RTX A1000 Mobile has a 56.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 216.7% lower power consumption.

The RTX A1000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 380 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R9 380 is a desktop card while RTX A1000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 380
Radeon R9 380
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile
RTX A1000 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 821 vote

Rate Radeon R9 380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 88 votes

Rate RTX A1000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.