Quadro T1000 vs Radeon R7 M370

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R7 M370 with Quadro T1000, including specs and performance data.

R7 M370
2015
4 GB GDDR5
3.68

T1000 outperforms R7 M370 by a whopping 356% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking714324
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data23.02
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameLithoTU117
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date5 May 2015 (9 years ago)27 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384no data
Core clock speed900 MHz1395 MHz
Boost clock speed960 MHz1455 MHz
Number of transistors690 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data50 Watt
Texture fill rate23.04no data
Floating-point processing power0.7373 TFLOPSno data
ROPs8no data
TMUs24no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1000 MHz8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth73.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Eyefinity+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212.0 (12_1)
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCLNot Listedno data
Mantle+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R7 M370 3.68
Quadro T1000 16.79
+356%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R7 M370 1417
Quadro T1000 6469
+357%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD14
−329%
60−65
+329%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−329%
30−33
+329%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
−355%
50−55
+355%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Battlefield 5 8−9
−338%
35−40
+338%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−338%
35−40
+338%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−329%
30−33
+329%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−329%
30−33
+329%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
−350%
45−50
+350%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−352%
95−100
+352%
Hitman 3 9−10
−344%
40−45
+344%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−323%
110−120
+323%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−350%
27−30
+350%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−344%
40−45
+344%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−329%
60−65
+329%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−352%
190−200
+352%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
−355%
50−55
+355%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Battlefield 5 8−9
−338%
35−40
+338%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−338%
35−40
+338%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−329%
30−33
+329%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−329%
30−33
+329%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
−350%
45−50
+350%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−352%
95−100
+352%
Hitman 3 9−10
−344%
40−45
+344%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−323%
110−120
+323%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−350%
27−30
+350%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−344%
40−45
+344%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−329%
60−65
+329%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 26
−323%
110−120
+323%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−352%
190−200
+352%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
−355%
50−55
+355%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−338%
35−40
+338%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−329%
30−33
+329%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−329%
30−33
+329%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−352%
95−100
+352%
Hitman 3 9−10
−344%
40−45
+344%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−323%
110−120
+323%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−329%
60−65
+329%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6
−350%
27−30
+350%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−352%
190−200
+352%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−344%
40−45
+344%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−350%
27−30
+350%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
−350%
27−30
+350%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−350%
18−20
+350%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Hitman 3 8−9
−338%
35−40
+338%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
−344%
40−45
+344%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
−335%
100−105
+335%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−329%
30−33
+329%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−350%
18−20
+350%

This is how R7 M370 and Quadro T1000 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro T1000 is 329% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.68 16.79
Recency 5 May 2015 27 May 2019
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm

Quadro T1000 has a 356.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro T1000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 M370 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R7 M370 is a notebook card while Quadro T1000 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 M370
Radeon R7 M370
NVIDIA Quadro T1000
Quadro T1000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 85 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 407 votes

Rate Quadro T1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.