FirePro W7100 vs Radeon R9 290X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 290X with FirePro W7100, including specs and performance data.

R9 290X
2013
4 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
19.27
+28.1%

R9 290X outperforms W7100 by a significant 28% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking290353
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.91no data
Power efficiency4.566.87
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameHawaiiTonga
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Designreferenceno data
Release date24 October 2013 (11 years ago)12 August 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$549 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores28161792
Core clock speedno data920 MHz
Boost clock speed947 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,200 million5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt400 Watt
Texture fill rate176.0103.0
Floating-point processing power5.632 TFLOPS3.297 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs176112

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0PCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length275 mm241 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Form factorno datafull height / full length
Supplementary power connectors1 x 6-pin + 1 x 8-pin1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width512 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth320 GB/s160 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort4x DisplayPort
Eyefinity+-
HDMI+-
DisplayPort support+-
StereoOutput3D-+
DisplayPort countno data4
Dual-link DVI support-+
HD сomponent video output-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-
CrossFire+-
FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
LiquidVR+-
TressFX+-
TrueAudio+-
UVD+-
DDMA audio+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 (12_0)
Shader Model6.36.3
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan+1.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 290X 19.27
+28.1%
FirePro W7100 15.04

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R9 290X 7425
+28.1%
FirePro W7100 5794

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD86
+32.3%
65−70
−32.3%
4K49
+40%
35−40
−40%

Cost per frame, $

1080p6.38no data
4K11.20no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+42.9%
21−24
−42.9%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+43.3%
30−33
−43.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+33.3%
24−27
−33.3%
Battlefield 5 60−65
+40%
45−50
−40%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+30%
30−33
−30%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+42.9%
21−24
−42.9%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+28.6%
35−40
−28.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+30%
40−45
−30%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+33.3%
90−95
−33.3%
Hitman 3 35−40
+37%
27−30
−37%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
+32.9%
70−75
−32.9%
Metro Exodus 65−70
+32%
50−55
−32%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+30%
40−45
−30%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 60−65
+40%
45−50
−40%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95
+28.6%
70−75
−28.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+43.3%
30−33
−43.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+33.3%
24−27
−33.3%
Battlefield 5 60−65
+40%
45−50
−40%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+30%
30−33
−30%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+42.9%
21−24
−42.9%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+28.6%
35−40
−28.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+30%
40−45
−30%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+33.3%
90−95
−33.3%
Hitman 3 35−40
+37%
27−30
−37%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
+32.9%
70−75
−32.9%
Metro Exodus 65−70
+32%
50−55
−32%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+30%
40−45
−30%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 60−65
+40%
45−50
−40%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 137
+37%
100−105
−37%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95
+28.6%
70−75
−28.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+43.3%
30−33
−43.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+33.3%
24−27
−33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+30%
30−33
−30%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+42.9%
21−24
−42.9%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+28.6%
35−40
−28.6%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+33.3%
90−95
−33.3%
Hitman 3 35−40
+37%
27−30
−37%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
+32.9%
70−75
−32.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 60−65
+40%
45−50
−40%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 29
+38.1%
21−24
−38.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95
+28.6%
70−75
−28.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+30%
40−45
−30%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+37%
27−30
−37%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+38.1%
21−24
−38.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 20−22
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+37.5%
16−18
−37.5%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+32.5%
80−85
−32.5%
Hitman 3 21−24
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+30%
30−33
−30%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+33.3%
27−30
−33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+30%
30−33
−30%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+37.5%
16−18
−37.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
+34.1%
85−90
−34.1%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+33.3%
24−27
−33.3%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Hitman 3 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
+32%
75−80
−32%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28
+33.3%
21−24
−33.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%

This is how R9 290X and FirePro W7100 compete in popular games:

  • R9 290X is 32% faster in 1080p
  • R9 290X is 40% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.27 15.04
Recency 24 October 2013 12 August 2014
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 400 Watt

R9 290X has a 28.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 60% lower power consumption.

FirePro W7100, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 months, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The Radeon R9 290X is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro W7100 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R9 290X is a desktop card while FirePro W7100 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 290X
Radeon R9 290X
AMD FirePro W7100
FirePro W7100

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 454 votes

Rate Radeon R9 290X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 74 votes

Rate FirePro W7100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.