GeForce GTX 750 vs Radeon R7 370

Place in the ranking	415	501
Place by popularity	not in top-100	84
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	6.37	4.39
Power efficiency	7.32	10.87
Architecture	GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)	Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code name	Trinidad	GM107
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Design	reference	no data
Release date	18 June 2015 (9 years ago)	18 February 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$149	$119

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

R7 370 has 45% better value for money than GTX 750.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1024	512
Core clock speed	no data	1020 MHz
Boost clock speed	975 MHz	1085 MHz
Number of transistors	2,800 million	1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	110 Watt	55 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	no data	95 °C
Texture fill rate	62.40	34.72
Floating-point processing power	1.997 TFLOPS	1.111 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	16
TMUs	64	32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	PCIe 3.0	PCI Express 3.0
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	152 mm	145 mm
Height	no data	4.376" (11.1 cm)
Width	2-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1 x 6-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	975 MHz	5.0 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	179.2 GB/s	80 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini-HDMI
Multi monitor support	no data	3 displays
Eyefinity	+	-
Number of Eyefinity displays	6	no data
HDMI	+	+
HDCP	-	+
Maximum VGA resolution	no data	2048x1536
DisplayPort support	+	-
Audio input for HDMI	no data	Internal

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration	+	-
CrossFire	+	-
FreeSync	+	-
TrueAudio	+	-
VCE	+	-
DDMA audio	+	no data
Blu Ray 3D	-	+
3D Gaming	-	+
3D Vision	-	+
3D Vision Live	-	+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	DirectX® 12	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.4
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
Vulkan	+	1.1.126
Mantle	+	-
CUDA	-	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R7 370 11.17
+34.7%

GTX 750 8.29

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R7 370 4499
+34.7%

GTX 750 3339

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

R7 370 5961
+50.2%

GTX 750 3970

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	47 +56.7%	30−35 −56.7%
1440p	57 +42.5%	40−45 −42.5%
4K	20 +42.9%	14−16 −42.9%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	3.17 +25.1%	3.97 −25.1%
1440p	2.61 +13.8%	2.98 −13.8%
4K	7.45 +14.1%	8.50 −14.1%

R7 370 has 25% lower cost per frame in 1080p
R7 370 has 14% lower cost per frame in 1440p
R7 370 has 14% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	20−22 +42.9%	14−16 −42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 +43.8%	16−18 −43.8%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 +40.7%	27−30 −40.7%
Counter-Strike 2	20−22 +42.9%	14−16 −42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 +43.8%	16−18 −43.8%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 +56.7%	30−33 −56.7%
Forza Horizon 5	30−33 +42.9%	21−24 −42.9%
Metro Exodus	30−35 +52.4%	21−24 −52.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−33 +42.9%	21−24 −42.9%
Valorant	35 +45.8%	24−27 −45.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 +40.7%	27−30 −40.7%
Counter-Strike 2	20−22 +42.9%	14−16 −42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 +43.8%	16−18 −43.8%
Dota 2	29 +38.1%	21−24 −38.1%
Far Cry 5	45−50 +53.3%	30−33 −53.3%
Fortnite	65−70 +48.9%	45−50 −48.9%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 +56.7%	30−33 −56.7%
Forza Horizon 5	30−33 +42.9%	21−24 −42.9%
Grand Theft Auto V	44 +46.7%	30−33 −46.7%
Metro Exodus	30−35 +52.4%	21−24 −52.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	55 +37.5%	40−45 −37.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−33 +42.9%	21−24 −42.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	37 +37%	27−30 −37%
Valorant	45−50 +53.3%	30−33 −53.3%
World of Tanks	160−170 +35%	120−130 −35%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 +40.7%	27−30 −40.7%
Counter-Strike 2	20−22 +42.9%	14−16 −42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 +43.8%	16−18 −43.8%
Dota 2	40−45 +40%	30−33 −40%
Far Cry 5	45−50 +53.3%	30−33 −53.3%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 +56.7%	30−33 −56.7%
Forza Horizon 5	30−33 +42.9%	21−24 −42.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	27 +50%	18−20 −50%
Valorant	20 +42.9%	14−16 −42.9%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 +60%	10−11 −60%
Grand Theft Auto V	16−18 +60%	10−11 −60%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	85−90 +45%	60−65 −45%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11 +42.9%	7−8 −42.9%
World of Tanks	81 +35%	60−65 −35%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 +43.8%	16−18 −43.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 +50%	6−7 −50%
Far Cry 5	24−27 +44.4%	18−20 −44.4%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 +50%	18−20 −50%
Forza Horizon 5	18−20 +50%	12−14 −50%
Metro Exodus	24−27 +50%	16−18 −50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 +60%	10−11 −60%
Valorant	17 +41.7%	12−14 −41.7%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +42.9%	7−8 −42.9%
Dota 2	21−24 +37.5%	16−18 −37.5%
Grand Theft Auto V	21−24 +37.5%	16−18 −37.5%
Metro Exodus	7−8 +40%	5−6 −40%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	37 +37%	27−30 −37%
Red Dead Redemption 2	8−9 +60%	5−6 −60%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 +37.5%	16−18 −37.5%
World of Tanks	45 +50%	30−33 −50%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	10−12 +37.5%	8−9 −37.5%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +42.9%	7−8 −42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Dota 2	21−24 +37.5%	16−18 −37.5%
Far Cry 5	14−16 +40%	10−11 −40%
Fortnite	12−14 +44.4%	9−10 −44.4%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 +60%	10−11 −60%
Forza Horizon 5	9−10 +50%	6−7 −50%
Valorant	12−14 +50%	8−9 −50%