GeForce GTX 750 vs Radeon R7 370

Place in the ranking	407	493
Place by popularity	not in top-100	95
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	6.65	4.59
Power efficiency	7.41	11.01
Architecture	GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)	Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code name	Trinidad	GM107
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Design	reference	no data
Release date	18 June 2015 (9 years ago)	18 February 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$149	$119

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

R7 370 has 45% better value for money than GTX 750.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1024	512
Core clock speed	no data	1020 MHz
Boost clock speed	975 MHz	1085 MHz
Number of transistors	2,800 million	1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	110 Watt	55 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	no data	95 °C
Texture fill rate	62.40	34.72
Floating-point processing power	1.997 TFLOPS	1.111 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	16
TMUs	64	32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	PCIe 3.0	PCI Express 3.0
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	152 mm	145 mm
Height	no data	4.376" (11.1 cm)
Width	2-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1 x 6-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	975 MHz	5.0 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	179.2 GB/s	80 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini-HDMI
Multi monitor support	no data	3 displays
Eyefinity	+	-
Number of Eyefinity displays	6	no data
HDMI	+	+
HDCP	-	+
Maximum VGA resolution	no data	2048x1536
DisplayPort support	+	-
Audio input for HDMI	no data	Internal

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration	+	-
CrossFire	+	-
FreeSync	+	-
TrueAudio	+	-
VCE	+	-
DDMA audio	+	no data
Blu Ray 3D	-	+
3D Gaming	-	+
3D Vision	-	+
3D Vision Live	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	DirectX® 12	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.4
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
Vulkan	+	1.1.126
Mantle	+	-
CUDA	-	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R7 370 11.69
+34.7%

GTX 750 8.68

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R7 370 4510
+34.7%

GTX 750 3347

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

R7 370 5961
+50.2%

GTX 750 3970

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	45 +50%	30−35 −50%
1440p	62 +37.8%	45−50 −37.8%
4K	20 +42.9%	14−16 −42.9%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	3.31	3.97
1440p	2.40	2.64
4K	7.45	8.50

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

18−20
+50%

12−14

−50%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 +50%	18−20 −50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 +50%	12−14 −50%
Battlefield 5	35−40 +37%	27−30 −37%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 +50%	16−18 −50%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +50%	12−14 −50%
Far Cry 5	27−30 +50%	18−20 −50%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35 +52.4%	21−24 −52.4%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 +41.8%	55−60 −41.8%
Hitman 3	21−24 +37.5%	16−18 −37.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	60−65 +37.8%	45−50 −37.8%
Metro Exodus	35−40 +40.7%	27−30 −40.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 +52.4%	21−24 −52.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 +40.7%	27−30 −40.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 +36%	50−55 −36%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 +50%	18−20 −50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 +50%	12−14 −50%
Battlefield 5	35−40 +37%	27−30 −37%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 +50%	16−18 −50%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +50%	12−14 −50%
Far Cry 5	27−30 +50%	18−20 −50%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35 +52.4%	21−24 −52.4%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 +41.8%	55−60 −41.8%
Hitman 3	21−24 +37.5%	16−18 −37.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	60−65 +37.8%	45−50 −37.8%
Metro Exodus	35−40 +40.7%	27−30 −40.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 +52.4%	21−24 −52.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 +40.7%	27−30 −40.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	89 +36.9%	65−70 −36.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 +36%	50−55 −36%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 +50%	18−20 −50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 +50%	12−14 −50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 +50%	16−18 −50%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +50%	12−14 −50%
Far Cry 5	27−30 +50%	18−20 −50%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 +41.8%	55−60 −41.8%
Hitman 3	21−24 +37.5%	16−18 −37.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	60−65 +37.8%	45−50 −37.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 +40.7%	27−30 −40.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	22 +37.5%	16−18 −37.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 +36%	50−55 −36%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

30−35
+52.4%

21−24

−52.4%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 +43.8%	16−18 −43.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20 +50%	12−14 −50%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 +50%	8−9 −50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	8−9 +60%	5−6 −60%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +50%	8−9 −50%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +50%	4−5 −50%
Far Cry 5	12−14 +44.4%	9−10 −44.4%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 +40%	40−45 −40%
Hitman 3	14−16 +50%	10−11 −50%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 +50%	16−18 −50%
Metro Exodus	18−20 +35.7%	14−16 −35.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18−20 +50%	12−14 −50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 +50%	8−9 −50%
Watch Dogs: Legion	70−75 +46%	50−55 −46%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

18−20
+35.7%

14−16

−35.7%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	10−12 +37.5%	8−9 −37.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	8−9 +60%	5−6 −60%
Hitman 3	8−9 +60%	5−6 −60%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 +35%	40−45 −35%
Metro Exodus	10−11 +42.9%	7−8 −42.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 +42.9%	7−8 −42.9%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 +40%	5−6 −40%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 +66.7%	3−4 −66.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 +50%	4−5 −50%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Far Cry 5	6−7 +50%	4−5 −50%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 +50%	10−11 −50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 +50%	6−7 −50%
Watch Dogs: Legion	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%