T1000 vs Radeon R7 350

Place in the ranking	673	336
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	7.22	28.17
Architecture	GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	Cape Verde	TU117
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	6 July 2016 (9 years ago)	6 May 2021 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	512	896
Core clock speed	800 MHz	1065 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1395 MHz
Number of transistors	1,500 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	55 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	25.60	78.12
Floating-point processing power	0.8192 TFLOPS	2.5 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	32
TMUs	32	56
L1 Cache	128 KB	896 KB
L2 Cache	256 KB	1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	168 mm	156 mm
Width	1-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1125 MHz	1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	72 GB/s	160.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	+	-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.8
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3
CUDA	-	7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

14−16

−293%

55
+293%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Far Cry 5	62 +0%	62 +0%
Fortnite	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Valorant	140−150 +0%	140−150 +0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	220−230 +0%	220−230 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Far Cry 5	57 +0%	57 +0%
Fortnite	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	77 +0%	77 +0%
Metro Exodus	35 +0%	35 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	64 +0%	64 +0%
Valorant	140−150 +0%	140−150 +0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Far Cry 5	53 +0%	53 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35 +0%	35 +0%
Valorant	140−150 +0%	140−150 +0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite

95−100

+0%

95−100

+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Metro Exodus	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	160−170 +0%	160−170 +0%
Valorant	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Far Cry 5	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite

40−45

+0%

40−45

+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Metro Exodus	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Valorant	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite

18−20

+0%

18−20

+0%

This is how R7 350 and T1000 compete in popular games:

T1000 is 293% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

there's a draw in 57 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	5.16	18.29
Recency	6 July 2016	6 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	55 Watt	50 Watt

T1000 has a 254% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 133% more advanced lithography process, and 10% lower power consumption.

The T1000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 350 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R7 350 is a desktop graphics card while T1000 is a workstation one.