ATI Radeon 7200 vs R7 250

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking	818	1544
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.10	no data
Power efficiency	2.83	no data
Architecture	GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)	Rage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code name	Oland	R100
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Design	reference	no data
Release date	8 October 2013 (11 years ago)	1 April 2000 (24 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$89	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	no data
Core clock speed	no data	166 MHz
Boost clock speed	1050 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	950 million	30 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	23 Watt
Texture fill rate	25.20	1
Floating-point processing power	0.8064 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	8	2
TMUs	24	6

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	PCIe 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	AGP 4x
Length	168 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	N/A	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	32 MB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1150 MHz	166 MHz
Memory bandwidth	72 GB/s	5.312 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA	1x VGA
HDMI	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration	+	-
CrossFire	+	-
FreeSync	+	-
DDMA audio	+	no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	DirectX® 12	7.0
Shader Model	5.1	no data
OpenGL	4.6	1.3
OpenCL	1.2	N/A
Vulkan	-	N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

---

---

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

19

no data

Cost per frame, $

1080p

4.68

no data

FPS performance in popular games

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	8 October 2013	1 April 2000
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	32 MB
Chip lithography	28 nm	180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	23 Watt

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---