GeForce 8700M GT SLI vs Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)

Place in the ranking	981	1145
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	2.27	0.94
Architecture	GCN 1.2/2.0 (2015−2016)	G8x (2007)
GPU code name	Stoney Ridge	NB8E-SE
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	1 June 2016 (8 years ago)	18 September 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	192	64
Core clock speed	no data	625 MHz
Boost clock speed	800 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	no data	578 Million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	12-45 Watt	58 Watt

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size

medium sized

large

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	no data	GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	no data	1 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	no data	800 MHz
Shared memory	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX

12 (FL 12_0)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R5 (Stoney Ridge) 1.48
+87.3%

8700M GT SLI 0.79

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

R5 (Stoney Ridge) 3346
+52.4%

8700M GT SLI 2196

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

8
+100%

4−5

−100%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

4−5
+33.3%

3−4

−33.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4 −25%	5−6 +25%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Far Cry 5	3	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	7 +600%	1−2 −600%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Hitman 3	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 +16.7%	12−14 −16.7%
Metro Exodus	7 +133%	3−4 −133%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12 +100%	6−7 −100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 +6.5%	30−35 −6.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Far Cry 5	1−2	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Hitman 3	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 +16.7%	12−14 −16.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 +33.3%	6−7 −33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 +10%	10−11 −10%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 +6.5%	30−35 −6.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Far Cry 5	1−2	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Hitman 3	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 +16.7%	12−14 −16.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 +33.3%	6−7 −33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 +10%	10−11 −10%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 +6.5%	30−35 −6.5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

0−1

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Far Cry 5	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Hitman 3	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2	0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5
+33.3%

3−4

−33.3%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn

0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	0−1	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4
+50%

2−3

−50%

This is how R5 (Stoney Ridge) and 8700M GT SLI compete in popular games:

R5 (Stoney Ridge) is 100% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Far Cry New Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the R5 (Stoney Ridge) is 600% faster.
in Assassin's Creed Odyssey, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the 8700M GT SLI is 25% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

R5 (Stoney Ridge) is ahead in 30 tests (86%)
8700M GT SLI is ahead in 1 test (3%)
there's a draw in 4 tests (11%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.48	0.79
Recency	1 June 2016	18 September 2007
Chip lithography	28 nm	80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	12 Watt	58 Watt

R5 (Stoney Ridge) has a 87.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 383.3% lower power consumption.

The Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8700M GT SLI in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.