Radeon R5 430 OEM vs R5 M240

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R5 M240 with Radeon R5 430 OEM, including specs and performance data.

R5 M240
2014
0 MB Not Listed
1.17

R5 430 OEM outperforms R5 M240 by a whopping 129% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1071809
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data3.67
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameJetOland
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date18 September 2014 (10 years ago)30 June 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320384
Core clock speed1000 MHz730 MHz
Boost clock speedno data780 MHz
Number of transistors690 million950 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data50 Watt
Texture fill rate20.6018.72
Floating-point processing power0.6592 TFLOPS0.599 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs2024

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportNot Listedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x8
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeNot ListedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount0 MB2 GB
Memory bus widthNot Listed64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1150 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s36.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort
Eyefinity+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1112 (11_1)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCLNot Listed1.2
Vulkan-1.2.131
Mantle+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R5 M240 1.17
R5 430 OEM 2.68
+129%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R5 M240 450
R5 430 OEM 1031
+129%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD14
−114%
30−35
+114%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Hitman 3 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−114%
30−33
+114%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−129%
16−18
+129%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−119%
70−75
+119%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Hitman 3 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−114%
30−33
+114%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−129%
16−18
+129%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−118%
24−27
+118%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−119%
70−75
+119%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Hitman 3 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−114%
30−33
+114%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−129%
16−18
+129%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−118%
24−27
+118%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−119%
70−75
+119%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Hitman 3 7−8
−129%
16−18
+129%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%

This is how R5 M240 and R5 430 OEM compete in popular games:

  • R5 430 OEM is 114% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.17 2.68
Recency 18 September 2014 30 June 2016

R5 430 OEM has a 129.1% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 year.

The Radeon R5 430 OEM is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R5 M240 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R5 M240 is a notebook card while Radeon R5 430 OEM is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R5 M240
Radeon R5 M240
AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM
Radeon R5 430 OEM

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 52 votes

Rate Radeon R5 M240 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 369 votes

Rate Radeon R5 430 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.