NVS 810 vs Radeon R5 Graphics

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated851
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data3.10
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code nameSpectre SLGM107
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date17 September 2014 (11 years ago)4 November 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256512 ×2
Core clock speed497 MHz902 MHz
Boost clock speed720 MHz1033 MHz
Number of transistors2,410 million1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt68 Watt
Texture fill rate7.95233.06 ×2
Floating-point processing power0.2545 TFLOPS1.058 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs416 ×2
TMUs1632 ×2
L1 Cacheno data256 KB
L2 Cacheno data1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data198 mm
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB ×2
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit ×2
Memory clock speedSystem Shared900 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data14.4 GB/s ×2
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs8x mini-DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.05.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.126
CUDA-5.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 September 2014 4 November 2015
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 68 Watt

R5 Graphics has 353% lower power consumption.

NVS 810, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 Graphics and NVS 810. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R5 Graphics is a desktop graphics card while NVS 810 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 1826 votes

Rate Radeon R5 Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 8 votes

Rate NVS 810 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R5 Graphics or NVS 810, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.