Iris Graphics 5100 vs Radeon R5 Graphics

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated904
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data4.43
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Generation 7.5 (2013)
GPU code nameSpectre SLHaswell GT3
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date17 September 2014 (10 years ago)27 May 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256320
Core clock speed497 MHz200 MHz
Boost clock speed720 MHz1100 MHz
Number of transistors2,410 million1,300 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm22 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rate7.95244.00
Floating-point processing power0.2545 TFLOPS0.704 TFLOPS
ROPs44
TMUs1640

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPRing Bus
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.05.1
OpenGL4.64.3
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.131+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 September 2014 27 May 2013
Chip lithography 28 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 30 Watt

R5 Graphics has an age advantage of 1 year, and 100% lower power consumption.

Iris Graphics 5100, on the other hand, has a 27.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 Graphics and Iris Graphics 5100. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R5 Graphics is a desktop card while Iris Graphics 5100 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
Radeon R5 Graphics
Intel Iris Graphics 5100
Iris Graphics 5100

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 1551 vote

Rate Radeon R5 Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 105 votes

Rate Iris Graphics 5100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.