Quadro P3200 vs Radeon Pro WX 4130

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro WX 4130 and Quadro P3200, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Pro WX 4130
2017
4 GB GDDR5, 50 Watt
5.62

P3200 outperforms Pro WX 4130 by a whopping 305% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking595244
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.0321.66
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameBaffinGP104
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date1 March 2017 (7 years ago)21 February 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6401792
Core clock speed1002 MHz1328 MHz
Boost clock speed1053 MHz1543 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate42.12172.8
Floating-point processing power1.348 TFLOPS5.53 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs40112

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB6 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1753 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s168.3 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
Optimus-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro WX 4130 5.62
Quadro P3200 22.74
+305%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro WX 4130 2168
Quadro P3200 8775
+305%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18−21
−367%
84
+367%
4K6−7
−367%
28
+367%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−311%
35−40
+311%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−364%
65
+364%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
−550%
35−40
+550%
Battlefield 5 14−16
−436%
75−80
+436%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−327%
45−50
+327%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−311%
35−40
+311%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−382%
50−55
+382%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−300%
60−65
+300%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−315%
130−140
+315%
Hitman 3 10−12
−318%
45−50
+318%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−224%
100−110
+224%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−508%
75−80
+508%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−329%
60−65
+329%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−579%
129
+579%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−111%
95−100
+111%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−529%
88
+529%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
−550%
35−40
+550%
Battlefield 5 14−16
−436%
75−80
+436%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−327%
45−50
+327%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−311%
35−40
+311%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−382%
50−55
+382%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−300%
60−65
+300%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−315%
130−140
+315%
Hitman 3 10−12
−318%
45−50
+318%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−224%
100−110
+224%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−508%
75−80
+508%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−329%
60−65
+329%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−305%
75−80
+305%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−178%
50−55
+178%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−111%
95−100
+111%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−186%
40
+186%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
−550%
35−40
+550%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−327%
45−50
+327%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−311%
35−40
+311%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−382%
50−55
+382%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−118%
72
+118%
Hitman 3 10−12
−318%
45−50
+318%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−224%
100−110
+224%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−305%
75−80
+305%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−156%
46
+156%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−111%
95−100
+111%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−329%
60−65
+329%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
−340%
40−45
+340%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−338%
35−40
+338%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−380%
24−27
+380%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 21−24
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−420%
24−27
+420%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−333%
24−27
+333%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−900%
130−140
+900%
Hitman 3 9−10
−200%
27−30
+200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−292%
45−50
+292%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−1333%
40−45
+1333%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−575%
27−30
+575%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−300%
130−140
+300%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−322%
35−40
+322%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−475%
21−24
+475%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%
Hitman 3 1−2
−1700%
18−20
+1700%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
−1211%
110−120
+1211%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−1150%
24−27
+1150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−2700%
28
+2700%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−500%
12−14
+500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−550%
12−14
+550%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 5−6
Far Cry 5 3−4
−333%
12−14
+333%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−520%
30−35
+520%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−233%
20−22
+233%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

This is how Pro WX 4130 and Quadro P3200 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P3200 is 367% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro P3200 is 367% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Quadro P3200 is 2700% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Quadro P3200 is ahead in 68 tests (97%)
  • there's a draw in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.62 22.74
Recency 1 March 2017 21 February 2018
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 75 Watt

Pro WX 4130 has a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 50% lower power consumption.

Quadro P3200, on the other hand, has a 304.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 months, and a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The Quadro P3200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro WX 4130 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro WX 4130
Radeon Pro WX 4130
NVIDIA Quadro P3200
Quadro P3200

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 34 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 4130 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 290 votes

Rate Quadro P3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.