GeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs Radeon Pro Vega 64

Place in performance ranking	146	5
Place by popularity	not in top-100	76
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	2.15	29.80
Architecture	GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)	Ada Lovelace
GPU code name	Vega 10	AD104-400
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	27 June 2017 (7 years ago)	3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$799
Current price	$6074	$837 (1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 4070 Ti has 1286% better value for money than Pro Vega 64.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	4096	7680
Core clock speed	1250 MHz	2310 MHz
Boost clock speed	1350 MHz	2610 MHz
Number of transistors	12,500 million	35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	285 Watt
Texture fill rate	345.6	626.4
Floating-point performance	11,059 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	267 mm	336 mm
Width	IGP	3-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	HBM2	GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	12 GB
Memory bus width	2048 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	1572 MHz	21000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	402.4 GB/s	504.2 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.1.125	1.3
CUDA	no data	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro Vega 64 33.53

RTX 4070 Ti 82.26
+145%

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti outperforms Radeon Pro Vega 64 by 145% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Pro Vega 64 12949

RTX 4070 Ti 31767
+145%

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti outperforms Radeon Pro Vega 64 by 145% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	90−95 −151%	226 +151%
1440p	60−65 −150%	150 +150%
4K	35−40 −166%	93 +166%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

95−100
−148%

236

+148%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	50−55 −166%	130−140 +166%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	60−65 −148%	140−150 +148%
Battlefield 5	95−100 −157%	240−250 +157%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 −167%	120−130 +167%
Cyberpunk 2077	85−90 −156%	218 +156%
Far Cry 5	45−50 −162%	110−120 +162%
Far Cry New Dawn	80−85 −151%	200−210 +151%
Forza Horizon 4	100−105 −151%	250−260 +151%
Hitman 3	50−55 −146%	120−130 +146%
Horizon Zero Dawn	190−200 −146%	467 +146%
Metro Exodus	60−65 −148%	140−150 +148%
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55 −148%	120−130 +148%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	230−240 −150%	575 +150%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 −164%	140−150 +164%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	50−55 −166%	130−140 +166%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	60−65 −148%	140−150 +148%
Battlefield 5	95−100 −157%	240−250 +157%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 −167%	120−130 +167%
Cyberpunk 2077	75−80 −147%	185 +147%
Far Cry 5	45−50 −162%	110−120 +162%
Far Cry New Dawn	80−85 −151%	200−210 +151%
Forza Horizon 4	100−105 −151%	250−260 +151%
Hitman 3	50−55 −146%	120−130 +146%
Horizon Zero Dawn	140−150 −148%	300−350 +148%
Metro Exodus	30−33 −177%	83 +177%
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55 −148%	120−130 +148%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	190−200 −149%	473 +149%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	180−190 −152%	453 +152%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 −164%	140−150 +164%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	50−55 −166%	130−140 +166%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	60−65 −148%	140−150 +148%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 −167%	120−130 +167%
Cyberpunk 2077	65−70 −157%	167 +157%
Far Cry 5	45−50 −162%	110−120 +162%
Forza Horizon 4	100−105 −151%	250−260 +151%
Horizon Zero Dawn	140−150 −151%	351 +151%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	160−170 −156%	410 +156%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	90−95 −147%	222 +147%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 −153%	152 +153%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

50−55
−148%

120−130

+148%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	65−70 −155%	160−170 +155%
Far Cry New Dawn	55−60 −162%	140−150 +162%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 −150%	100−105 +150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45 −170%	100−110 +170%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 −149%	110−120 +149%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 −163%	105 +163%
Far Cry 5	70−75 −160%	182 +160%
Forza Horizon 4	85−90 −151%	210−220 +151%
Hitman 3	45−50 −169%	120−130 +169%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 −148%	273 +148%
Metro Exodus	60−65 −147%	148 +147%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	110−120 −155%	280 +155%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	60−65 −162%	150−160 +162%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 −169%	121 +169%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

50−55
−152%

120−130

+152%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 −151%	85−90 +151%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 −156%	65−70 +156%
Hitman 3	30−33 −153%	75−80 +153%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 −147%	130−140 +147%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45 −160%	104 +160%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	60−65 −148%	149 +148%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 −167%	70−75 +167%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	27−30 −156%	65−70 +156%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 −148%	50−55 +148%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −167%	48 +167%
Far Cry 5	18−20 −178%	50−55 +178%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 −155%	160−170 +155%
Horizon Zero Dawn	65−70 −148%	161 +148%
Metro Exodus	45−50 −149%	112 +149%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −152%	68 +152%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

40−45

−148%

95−100
+148%

This is how Pro Vega 64 and RTX 4070 Ti compete in popular games:

RTX 4070 Ti is 151% faster in 1080p
RTX 4070 Ti is 150% faster in 1440p
RTX 4070 Ti is 166% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	33.53	82.26
Recency	27 June 2017	3 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	12 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	285 Watt