Radeon R9 FURY X vs Pro VII

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro VII with Radeon R9 FURY X, including specs and performance data.

Pro VII
2020
16 GB HBM2, 250 Watt
33.28
+34%

Pro VII outperforms R9 FURY X by a substantial 34% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking160217
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation15.746.83
Power efficiency9.256.28
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameVega 20Fiji
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Designno datareference
Release date13 May 2020 (4 years ago)24 June 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,899 $649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Pro VII has 130% better value for money than R9 FURY X.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38404096
Compute unitsno data64
Core clock speed1400 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1700 MHz1050 MHz
Number of transistors13,230 million8,900 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt275 Watt
Texture fill rate408.0268.8
Floating-point processing power13.06 TFLOPS8.602 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs240256

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length305 mm191 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin2x 8-pin
Bridgeless CrossFire-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2High Bandwidth Memory (HBM)
High bandwidth memory (HBM)no data+
Maximum RAM amount16 GB4 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1050 MHz
Memory bandwidth1024 GB/s512 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
Eyefinity-+
Number of Eyefinity displaysno data6
HDMI-+
DisplayPort support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration-+
CrossFire-+
FRTC-+
FreeSync-+
HD3D-+
LiquidVR-+
PowerTune-+
TressFX-+
TrueAudio-+
UVD-+
VCE-+
DDMA audiono data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)DirectX® 12
Shader Model6.76.3
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL2.12.0
Vulkan1.3+
Mantle-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro VII 33.28
+34%
R9 FURY X 24.83

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro VII 12838
+34%
R9 FURY X 9580

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 33.28 24.83
Recency 13 May 2020 24 June 2015
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 275 Watt

Pro VII has a 34% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 10% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Pro VII is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 FURY X in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro VII is a workstation graphics card while Radeon R9 FURY X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro VII
Radeon Pro VII
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
Radeon R9 FURY X

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 1548 votes

Rate Radeon Pro VII on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 83 votes

Rate Radeon R9 FURY X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.