Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs vs Radeon Pro 555X

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro 555X with Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, including specs and performance data.

Pro 555X
2018
4 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
7.24
+8.7%

Pro 555X outperforms Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs by a small 9% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking520542
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.6618.88
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code namePolaris 21Tiger Lake Xe
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date16 July 2018 (6 years ago)15 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores76880
Core clock speed907 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1350 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate43.54no data
Floating-point processing power1.393 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16no data
TMUs48no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1275 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth81.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12_1
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18−21
−5.6%
19
+5.6%
1440p9−10
+0%
9
+0%
4K14−16
+0%
14
+0%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+29%
31
−29%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+14.3%
14
−14.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+0%
14
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+30.8%
26
−30.8%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+66.7%
24
−66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+33.3%
12
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+25%
20
−25%
Fortnite 45−50
+6.8%
40−45
−6.8%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+9.4%
30−35
−9.4%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
+9.5%
21
−9.5%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+7.7%
12−14
−7.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+7.7%
24−27
−7.7%
Valorant 80−85
+5.2%
75−80
−5.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+47.8%
23
−47.8%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+233%
12
−233%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130
+6.9%
110−120
−6.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+60%
10
−60%
Dota 2 60−65
+53.8%
39
−53.8%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+31.6%
19
−31.6%
Fortnite 45−50
+6.8%
40−45
−6.8%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+9.4%
30−35
−9.4%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
+15%
20
−15%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
+107%
14
−107%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+7.7%
12−14
−7.7%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+25%
12
−25%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+7.7%
24−27
−7.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−4.8%
22
+4.8%
Valorant 80−85
+5.2%
75−80
−5.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+47.8%
23
−47.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+77.8%
9
−77.8%
Dota 2 60−65
+66.7%
36
−66.7%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+38.9%
18
−38.9%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+9.4%
30−35
−9.4%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+7.7%
12−14
−7.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+7.7%
24−27
−7.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+90.9%
11
−90.9%
Valorant 80−85
+5.2%
75−80
−5.2%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 45−50
+6.8%
40−45
−6.8%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 60−65
+9.1%
55−60
−9.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 10−12
+83.3%
6
−83.3%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+2.5%
40−45
−2.5%
Valorant 85−90
+8.5%
80−85
−8.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6
+0%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+33.3%
12
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+11.8%
16−18
−11.8%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+20%
10
−20%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 16−18
+6.7%
14−16
−6.7%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 1−2 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Hogwarts Legacy 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Valorant 40−45
+10.8%
35−40
−10.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Counter-Strike 2 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Dota 2 27−30
+81.3%
16
−81.3%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+18.2%
10−12
−18.2%
Hogwarts Legacy 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%

This is how Pro 555X and Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs compete in popular games:

  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 6% faster in 1080p
  • A tie in 1440p
  • A tie in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Pro 555X is 233% faster.
  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 5% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Pro 555X is ahead in 61 test (95%)
  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is ahead in 1 test (2%)
  • there's a draw in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.24 6.66
Recency 16 July 2018 15 August 2020
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 28 Watt

Pro 555X has a 8.7% higher aggregate performance score.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 167.9% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon Pro 555X and Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 555X is a mobile workstation card while Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555X
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 172 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 555X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 968 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro 555X or Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.