Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs Radeon Pro 555X
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon Pro 555X with Iris Xe Graphics G7, including specs and performance data.
Iris Xe Graphics G7 outperforms Pro 555X by a significant 26% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 505 | 435 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 18 |
| Power efficiency | 7.73 | no data |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) |
| GPU code name | Polaris 21 | Tiger Lake Xe |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 16 July 2018 (6 years ago) | 15 August 2020 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 768 | 96 |
| Core clock speed | 907 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 3,000 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | no data |
| Texture fill rate | 43.54 | no data |
| Floating-point processing power | 1.393 TFLOPS | no data |
| ROPs | 16 | no data |
| TMUs | 48 | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR4 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | no data |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | no data |
| Memory clock speed | 1275 MHz | no data |
| Memory bandwidth | 81.6 GB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | no data |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| FreeSync | + | - |
| Quick Sync | no data | + |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | DirectX 12_1 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | no data |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | no data |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 16−18
−12.5%
|
18−20
+12.5%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 16−18
−12.5%
|
18−20
+12.5%
|
| Elden Ring | 21−24
−17.4%
|
27−30
+17.4%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 27−30
−29.6%
|
35−40
+29.6%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 16−18
−12.5%
|
18−20
+12.5%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 16−18
−12.5%
|
18−20
+12.5%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 30−35
−23.5%
|
40−45
+23.5%
|
| Metro Exodus | 21−24
−22.7%
|
27−30
+22.7%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 21−24
−21.7%
|
27−30
+21.7%
|
| Valorant | 30−33
−33.3%
|
40−45
+33.3%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 27−30
−29.6%
|
35−40
+29.6%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 16−18
−12.5%
|
18−20
+12.5%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 16−18
−12.5%
|
18−20
+12.5%
|
| Dota 2 | 30−33
−26.7%
|
35−40
+26.7%
|
| Elden Ring | 21−24
−17.4%
|
27−30
+17.4%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 35−40
−19.4%
|
40−45
+19.4%
|
| Fortnite | 45−50
−26.5%
|
60−65
+26.5%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 30−35
−23.5%
|
40−45
+23.5%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 30−33
−26.7%
|
35−40
+26.7%
|
| Metro Exodus | 21−24
−31.8%
|
27−30
+31.8%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 65−70
−20.9%
|
80−85
+20.9%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 21−24
−21.7%
|
27−30
+21.7%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
−23.1%
|
30−35
+23.1%
|
| Valorant | 30−33
−33.3%
|
40−45
+33.3%
|
| World of Tanks | 120−130
−19.8%
|
150−160
+19.8%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 27−30
−29.6%
|
35−40
+29.6%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 16−18
−12.5%
|
18−20
+12.5%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 16−18
−12.5%
|
18−20
+12.5%
|
| Dota 2 | 30−33
−26.7%
|
35−40
+26.7%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 35−40
−19.4%
|
40−45
+19.4%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 30−35
−23.5%
|
40−45
+23.5%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 65−70
−20.9%
|
80−85
+20.9%
|
| Valorant | 30−33
−16.7%
|
35−40
+16.7%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Dota 2 | 10−11
−20%
|
12−14
+20%
|
| Elden Ring | 10−12
−9.1%
|
12−14
+9.1%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 10−11
−40%
|
14−16
+40%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 40−45
−19%
|
50−55
+19%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 7−8
−28.6%
|
9−10
+28.6%
|
| World of Tanks | 60−65
−23%
|
75−80
+23%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 14−16
−40%
|
21−24
+40%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 10−11
−20%
|
12−14
+20%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 6−7
−16.7%
|
7−8
+16.7%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 18−20
−27.8%
|
21−24
+27.8%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 16−18
−41.2%
|
24−27
+41.2%
|
| Metro Exodus | 14−16
−14.3%
|
16−18
+14.3%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 10−11
−20%
|
12−14
+20%
|
| Valorant | 21−24
−14.3%
|
24−27
+14.3%
|
4K
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
| Dota 2 | 18−20
−10.5%
|
21−24
+10.5%
|
| Elden Ring | 5−6
−20%
|
6−7
+20%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 18−20
−10.5%
|
21−24
+10.5%
|
| Metro Exodus | 4−5
−50%
|
6−7
+50%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 24−27
−25%
|
30−33
+25%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 5−6
−40%
|
7−8
+40%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 18−20
−10.5%
|
21−24
+10.5%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 7−8
−28.6%
|
9−10
+28.6%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
| Dota 2 | 18−20
−10.5%
|
21−24
+10.5%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 10−11
−30%
|
12−14
+30%
|
| Fortnite | 8−9
−25%
|
10−11
+25%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 10−11
−30%
|
12−14
+30%
|
| Valorant | 8−9
−25%
|
10−11
+25%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Far Cry 5 | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 60−65
+0%
|
60−65
+0%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 80−85
+0%
|
80−85
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 60−65
+0%
|
60−65
+0%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Metro Exodus | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
| Valorant | 10−12
+0%
|
10−12
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 10−12
+0%
|
10−12
+0%
|
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Iris Xe Graphics G7 is 50% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 is ahead in 34 tests (76%)
- there's a draw in 11 tests (24%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 8.42 | 10.61 |
| Recency | 16 July 2018 | 15 August 2020 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
Iris Xe Graphics G7 has a 26% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro 555X in performance tests.
Be aware that Radeon Pro 555X is a mobile workstation card while Iris Xe Graphics G7 is a mobile workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
