GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB vs Radeon Pro 5500M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro 5500M with GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB, including specs and performance data.

Pro 5500M
2019
8 GB GDDR6, 85 Watt
17.59

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking310309
Place by popularitynot in top-10025
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data37.01
Power efficiency14.1913.42
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 14GA107
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date13 November 2019 (5 years ago)27 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores15362048
Core clock speed1000 MHz1545 MHz
Boost clock speed1450 MHz1740 MHz
Number of transistors6,400 million8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt90 Watt
Texture fill rate139.2111.4
Floating-point processing power4.454 TFLOPS7.127 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs9664
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data242 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA-8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro 5500M 17.59
RTX 3050 4 GB 17.62
+0.2%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro 5500M 6778
RTX 3050 4 GB 6788
+0.1%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD59
+7.3%
55−60
−7.3%
1440p56
+1.8%
55−60
−1.8%
4K26
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.62
1440pno data3.62
4Kno data8.29

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+3.7%
27−30
−3.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+7.4%
27−30
−7.4%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+5.5%
55−60
−5.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+2.9%
35−40
−2.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+3.7%
27−30
−3.7%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+2.5%
40−45
−2.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+6.7%
45−50
−6.7%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+1.8%
110−120
−1.8%
Hitman 3 30−35
+13.3%
30−33
−13.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
+2.4%
85−90
−2.4%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+1.7%
60−65
−1.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 75
+0%
75−80
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
+5.5%
55−60
−5.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+7.4%
27−30
−7.4%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+5.5%
55−60
−5.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50
+0%
50−55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+3.7%
27−30
−3.7%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+2.5%
40−45
−2.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+6.7%
45−50
−6.7%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+1.8%
110−120
−1.8%
Hitman 3 30−35
+13.3%
30−33
−13.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
+2.4%
85−90
−2.4%
Metro Exodus 32
+6.7%
30−33
−6.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 51
+2%
50−55
−2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
+5.5%
55−60
−5.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+2.5%
40−45
−2.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+7.4%
27−30
−7.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+3.7%
27−30
−3.7%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+2.5%
40−45
−2.5%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+1.8%
110−120
−1.8%
Hitman 3 30−35
+13.3%
30−33
−13.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
+2.4%
85−90
−2.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
+5.5%
55−60
−5.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 39
+11.4%
35−40
−11.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 54
+8%
50−55
−8%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+13.3%
30−33
−13.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+1.1%
95−100
−1.1%
Hitman 3 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+2.9%
35−40
−2.9%
Metro Exodus 41
+2.5%
40−45
−2.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+13.3%
30−33
−13.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 115
+4.5%
110−120
−4.5%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35
+0%
35−40
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Hitman 3 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16
+0%
16−18
+0%

This is how Pro 5500M and RTX 3050 4 GB compete in popular games:

  • Pro 5500M is 7% faster in 1080p
  • Pro 5500M is 2% faster in 1440p
  • Pro 5500M is 8% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.59 17.62
Recency 13 November 2019 27 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 90 Watt

Pro 5500M has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 5.9% lower power consumption.

RTX 3050 4 GB, on the other hand, has a 0.2% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 2 years.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon Pro 5500M and GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 5500M is a mobile workstation card while GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
Radeon Pro 5500M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB
GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 265 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 2592 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.