GeForce RTX 4070 vs Radeon Pro 5300M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro 5300M with GeForce RTX 4070, including specs and performance data.

Pro 5300M
2019
4 GB GDDR6, 85 Watt
15.42

RTX 4070 outperforms Pro 5300M by a whopping 353% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking34520
Place by popularitynot in top-10032
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data60.23
Power efficiency12.4423.96
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 14AD104
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date13 November 2019 (5 years ago)12 April 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12805888
Core clock speed1000 MHz1920 MHz
Boost clock speed1250 MHz2475 MHz
Number of transistors6,400 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate100.0455.4
Floating-point processing power3.2 TFLOPS29.15 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs80184
Tensor Coresno data184
Ray Tracing Coresno data46

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data240 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount4 GB12 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/s504.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA-8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro 5300M 15.42
RTX 4070 69.90
+353%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro 5300M 5940
RTX 4070 26936
+353%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD45−50
−387%
219
+387%
1440p27−30
−359%
124
+359%
4K16−18
−375%
76
+375%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.74
1440pno data4.83
4Kno data7.88

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−800%
216
+800%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−311%
140−150
+311%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
−400%
120−130
+400%
Battlefield 5 50−55
−346%
220−230
+346%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
−284%
110−120
+284%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−625%
174
+625%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−225%
110−120
+225%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
−307%
170−180
+307%
Forza Horizon 4 100−105
−138%
230−240
+138%
Hitman 3 27−30
−345%
120−130
+345%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
−226%
250−260
+226%
Metro Exodus 50−55
−192%
150−160
+192%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−190%
120−130
+190%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
−488%
290−300
+488%
Watch Dogs: Legion 75−80
−93.7%
150−160
+93.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−311%
140−150
+311%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
−400%
120−130
+400%
Battlefield 5 50−55
−346%
220−230
+346%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
−284%
110−120
+284%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−496%
143
+496%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−225%
110−120
+225%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
−307%
170−180
+307%
Forza Horizon 4 100−105
−138%
230−240
+138%
Hitman 3 27−30
−345%
120−130
+345%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
−226%
250−260
+226%
Metro Exodus 50−55
−192%
150−160
+192%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−190%
120−130
+190%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
−652%
376
+652%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
−305%
150−160
+305%
Watch Dogs: Legion 75−80
−93.7%
150−160
+93.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−311%
140−150
+311%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
−400%
120−130
+400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
−284%
110−120
+284%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−433%
128
+433%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−225%
110−120
+225%
Forza Horizon 4 100−105
−138%
230−240
+138%
Hitman 3 27−30
−345%
120−130
+345%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
−276%
293
+276%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
−544%
322
+544%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
−359%
170
+359%
Watch Dogs: Legion 75−80
−57%
124
+57%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−190%
120−130
+190%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−33
−450%
160−170
+450%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−363%
110−120
+363%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−447%
80−85
+447%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
−585%
85−90
+585%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
−382%
80−85
+382%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−913%
81
+913%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−356%
80−85
+356%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−235%
270−280
+235%
Hitman 3 18−20
−467%
100−110
+467%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−616%
222
+616%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−430%
143
+430%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
−693%
222
+693%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−688%
120−130
+688%
Watch Dogs: Legion 95−100
−152%
230−240
+152%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−360%
110−120
+360%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
−487%
85−90
+487%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
−527%
65−70
+527%
Hitman 3 10−12
−455%
60−65
+455%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
−190%
220−230
+190%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−640%
110−120
+640%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−667%
115
+667%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−544%
55−60
+544%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
−686%
55−60
+686%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−550%
50−55
+550%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1100%
36
+1100%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−525%
50−55
+525%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−476%
120−130
+476%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−707%
121
+707%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
−733%
50
+733%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−443%
75−80
+443%

This is how Pro 5300M and RTX 4070 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4070 is 387% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4070 is 359% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4070 is 375% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 4070 is 1100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 4070 surpassed Pro 5300M in all 72 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.42 69.90
Recency 13 November 2019 12 April 2023
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 200 Watt

Pro 5300M has 135.3% lower power consumption.

RTX 4070, on the other hand, has a 353.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4070 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro 5300M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 5300M is a mobile workstation card while GeForce RTX 4070 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon Pro 5300M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070
GeForce RTX 4070

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 170 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 9325 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.