GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs Radeon Pro 5300M

Place in the ranking	346	124
Place by popularity	not in top-100	42
Power efficiency	12.62	51.63
Architecture	RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	Navi 14	AD107
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	13 November 2019 (5 years ago)	3 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1280	2560
Core clock speed	1000 MHz	1455 MHz
Boost clock speed	1250 MHz	1755 MHz
Number of transistors	6,400 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	85 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	100.0	140.4
Floating-point processing power	3.2 TFLOPS	8.986 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	80	80
Tensor Cores	no data	80
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	large
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	6 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	96 Bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz	16000 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	192.0 GB/s	192.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Portable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3
CUDA	-	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro 5300M 15.58

RTX 4050 Mobile 37.50
+141%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro 5300M 5989

RTX 4050 Mobile 14418
+141%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	35−40 −171%	95 +171%
1440p	18−20 −161%	47 +161%
4K	12−14 −158%	31 +158%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	27−30 −193%	79 +193%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 −232%	103 +232%
Elden Ring	45−50 −144%	117 +144%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	50−55 −100%	100−110 +100%
Counter-Strike 2	27−30 −148%	67 +148%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 −32.3%	41 +32.3%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 −219%	204 +219%
Metro Exodus	40−45 −117%	90−95 +117%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 −94.7%	70−75 +94.7%
Valorant	60−65 −198%	185 +198%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	50−55 −100%	100−110 +100%
Counter-Strike 2	27−30 −119%	59 +119%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 −16.1%	36 +16.1%
Dota 2	55−60 −150%	140 +150%
Elden Ring	45−50 −167%	128 +167%
Far Cry 5	55−60 −73.2%	97 +73.2%
Fortnite	85−90 −93%	160−170 +93%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 −163%	168 +163%
Grand Theft Auto V	55−60 −125%	126 +125%
Metro Exodus	40−45 +31.3%	32 −31.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	110−120 −77.5%	190−200 +77.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 −94.7%	70−75 +94.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	45−50 −175%	130−140 +175%
Valorant	60−65 −142%	150−160 +142%
World of Tanks	190−200 −40.2%	270−280 +40.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	50−55 −100%	100−110 +100%
Counter-Strike 2	27−30 −59.3%	43 +59.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 −6.5%	33 +6.5%
Dota 2	55−60 −189%	162 +189%
Far Cry 5	55−60 −69.6%	95−100 +69.6%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 −127%	145 +127%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	110−120 −77.5%	190−200 +77.5%
Valorant	60−65 −123%	138 +123%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	21−24 −152%	58 +152%
Elden Ring	24−27 −133%	56 +133%
Grand Theft Auto V	21−24 −152%	58 +152%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	140−150 −23.2%	170−180 +23.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −164%	35−40 +164%
World of Tanks	100−110 −118%	230−240 +118%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35 −126%	70−75 +126%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −92.3%	25 +92.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −50%	18 +50%
Far Cry 5	35−40 −218%	120−130 +218%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −121%	84 +121%
Metro Exodus	30−35 −141%	80−85 +141%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20−22 −195%	59 +195%
Valorant	35−40 −136%	92 +136%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−12 +37.5%	8 −37.5%
Dota 2	27−30 −137%	64 +137%
Elden Ring	10−12 −218%	35−40 +218%
Grand Theft Auto V	27−30 −137%	64 +137%
Metro Exodus	10−12 −309%	45 +309%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	45−50 −161%	120−130 +161%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11 −140%	24−27 +140%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 −137%	64 +137%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	14−16 −187%	40−45 +187%
Counter-Strike 2	10−12 −245%	35−40 +245%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −125%	9 +125%
Dota 2	27−30 −326%	115 +326%
Far Cry 5	20−22 −175%	55−60 +175%
Fortnite	18−20 −189%	50−55 +189%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −141%	53 +141%
Valorant	16−18 −253%	60−65 +253%

This is how Pro 5300M and RTX 4050 Mobile compete in popular games:

RTX 4050 Mobile is 171% faster in 1080p
RTX 4050 Mobile is 161% faster in 1440p
RTX 4050 Mobile is 158% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Pro 5300M is 38% faster.
in Dota 2, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 4050 Mobile is 326% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Pro 5300M is ahead in 2 tests (3%)
RTX 4050 Mobile is ahead in 61 test (97%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	15.58	37.50
Recency	13 November 2019	3 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	6 GB
Chip lithography	7 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	85 Watt	50 Watt

RTX 4050 Mobile has a 140.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 70% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro 5300M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 5300M is a mobile workstation card while GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.