Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition vs Pro 5300
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon Pro 5300 with Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition, including specs and performance data.
Pro 5300 outperforms R9 M295X Mac Edition by a substantial 38% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 294 | 378 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 15.51 | 3.81 |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) | GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) |
| GPU code name | Navi 14 | Amethyst |
| Market segment | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 4 August 2020 (4 years ago) | 23 November 2014 (9 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1280 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 6,400 million | 5,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 85 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 132.0 | 108.8 |
| Floating-point processing power | 4.224 TFLOPS | 3.482 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 80 | 128 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Width | IGP | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz | 1362 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 224.0 GB/s | 174.3 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2.131 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 18.51 | 13.38 |
| Recency | 4 August 2020 | 23 November 2014 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 85 Watt | 250 Watt |
Pro 5300 has a 38.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 194.1% lower power consumption.
The Radeon Pro 5300 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition in performance tests.
Be aware that Radeon Pro 5300 is a workstation card while Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
