GeForce FX 5200 vs Radeon Pro 5300

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro 5300 with GeForce FX 5200, including specs and performance data.

Pro 5300
2020
4 GB GDDR6, 85 Watt
18.57
+92750%

Pro 5300 outperforms FX 5200 by a whopping 92750% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking2981492
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency15.14no data
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameNavi 14NV18 C1
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date4 August 2020 (4 years ago)6 March 2003 (21 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$69.99

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1280no data
Core clock speed1000 MHz250 MHz
Boost clock speed1650 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,400 million29 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)85 Wattno data
Texture fill rate132.01.000
Floating-point processing power4.224 TFLOPSno data
ROPs322
TMUs804

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8AGP 8x
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR
Maximum RAM amount4 GB128 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz200 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s6.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)8.0
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.61.3
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro 5300 18.57
+92750%
FX 5200 0.02

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro 5300 7143
+101943%
FX 5200 7

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.57 0.02
Recency 4 August 2020 6 March 2003
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 7 nm 150 nm

Pro 5300 has a 92750% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 17 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2042.9% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro 5300 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce FX 5200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 5300 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce FX 5200 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 5300
Radeon Pro 5300
NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200
GeForce FX 5200

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 98 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 250 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.