Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon Pro 450

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro 450 with Iris Pro Graphics 5200, including specs and performance data.

Pro 450
2016
2 GB GDDR5, 35 Watt
7.06
+130%
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
2013
System shared System shared + 128 MB eDRAM, 45 Watt
3.07

Pro 450 outperforms Iris Pro Graphics 5200 by a whopping 130% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking551766
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency13.837.02
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Generation 7.5 (2013)
GPU code nameBaffinHaswell GT3e
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date30 October 2016 (8 years ago)27 May 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640320
Core clock speed800 MHz200 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1200 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million392 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm22 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate32.0048.00
Floating-point processing power1.024 TFLOPS0.768 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs4040

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8Ring Bus

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System shared + 128 MB eDRAM
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1270 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth81.28 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.3
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.131+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro 450 7.06
+130%
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 3.07

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro 450 2722
+130%
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 1184

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Pro 450 4502
+134%
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 1923

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Pro 450 14245
+63.9%
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 8692

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Pro 450 3252
+136%
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 1381

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Pro 450 21533
+80.5%
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 11930

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Pro 450 200518
+82.1%
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 110085

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD27
+50%
18
−50%
4K16−18
+129%
7
−129%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+100%
9−10
−100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Battlefield 5 20−22
+300%
5−6
−300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+114%
7−8
−114%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+167%
6−7
−167%
Far Cry New Dawn 20−22
+150%
8−9
−150%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+188%
16−18
−188%
Hitman 3 14−16
+75%
8−9
−75%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+90.9%
21−24
−90.9%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+400%
4−5
−400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+171%
7−8
−171%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
+100%
12−14
−100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+35.9%
35−40
−35.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+100%
9−10
−100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Battlefield 5 20−22
+300%
5−6
−300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+114%
7−8
−114%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+167%
6−7
−167%
Far Cry New Dawn 20−22
+150%
8−9
−150%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+188%
16−18
−188%
Hitman 3 14−16
+75%
8−9
−75%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+90.9%
21−24
−90.9%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+400%
4−5
−400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+171%
7−8
−171%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
+100%
12−14
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+10.5%
19
−10.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+35.9%
35−40
−35.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+100%
9−10
−100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+114%
7−8
−114%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+167%
6−7
−167%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+188%
16−18
−188%
Hitman 3 14−16
+75%
8−9
−75%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+90.9%
21−24
−90.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
+100%
12−14
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+50%
14−16
−50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+35.9%
35−40
−35.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+171%
7−8
−171%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+180%
5−6
−180%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+150%
10−11
−150%
Hitman 3 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
+87.5%
8−9
−87.5%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+150%
18−20
−150%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+100%
6−7
−100%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Hitman 3 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+144%
9−10
−144%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%

This is how Pro 450 and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 compete in popular games:

  • Pro 450 is 50% faster in 1080p
  • Pro 450 is 129% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Pro 450 is 800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, Pro 450 surpassed Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in all 62 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.06 3.07
Recency 30 October 2016 27 May 2013
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 45 Watt

Pro 450 has a 130% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 57.1% more advanced lithography process, and 28.6% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Pro 450 is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 450 is a mobile workstation card while Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 450
Radeon Pro 450
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Iris Pro Graphics 5200

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 50 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 163 votes

Rate Iris Pro Graphics 5200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.