GeForce GTX 1080 Ti vs Radeon PRO W7600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon PRO W7600 with GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, including specs and performance data.

PRO W7600
2023
8 GB GDDR6, 130 Watt
36.96

GTX 1080 Ti outperforms PRO W7600 by a substantial 30% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking13070
Place by popularitynot in top-10041
Cost-effectiveness evaluation71.1120.83
Power efficiency19.4913.21
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameNavi 33GP102
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date3 August 2023 (1 year ago)10 March 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 $699

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

PRO W7600 has 241% better value for money than GTX 1080 Ti.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20483584
Core clock speedno data1481 MHz
Boost clock speed2440 MHz1582 MHz
Number of transistors13,300 million11,800 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt250 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data91 °C
Texture fill rate312.3354.4
Floating-point processing powerno data11.34 TFLOPS
ROPs6488
TMUs128224

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Length241 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Recommended system power (PSU)no data600 Watt
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5X
Maximum RAM amount8 GB11 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit352 Bit
Memory clock speed18 GB/s1376 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s484.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort 2.11x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI-+
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boostno data3.0
Ansel-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.76.4
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL2.21.2
Vulkan1.3+
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

PRO W7600 36.96
GTX 1080 Ti 48.17
+30.3%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

PRO W7600 14240
GTX 1080 Ti 18562
+30.4%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD100−110
−32%
132
+32%
1440p60−65
−38.3%
83
+38.3%
4K50−55
−32%
66
+32%

Cost per frame, $

1080p5.995.30
1440p9.988.42
4K11.9810.59

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 100
+0%
100
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Battlefield 5 162
+0%
162
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Far Cry 5 122
+0%
122
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 293
+0%
293
+0%
Hitman 3 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Metro Exodus 144
+0%
144
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 215
+0%
215
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 145
+0%
145
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Battlefield 5 147
+0%
147
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Far Cry 5 96
+0%
96
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 59
+0%
59
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 284
+0%
284
+0%
Hitman 3 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Metro Exodus 144
+0%
144
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 196
+0%
196
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 71
+0%
71
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 81
+0%
81
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Far Cry 5 73
+0%
73
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 120
+0%
120
+0%
Hitman 3 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 153
+0%
153
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 167
+0%
167
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 98
+0%
98
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 121
+0%
121
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 108
+0%
108
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 86
+0%
86
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 62
+0%
62
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 62
+0%
62
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 55
+0%
55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 265
+0%
265
+0%
Hitman 3 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 118
+0%
118
+0%
Metro Exodus 88
+0%
88
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 123
+0%
123
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 98
+0%
98
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 56
+0%
56
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 69
+0%
69
+0%
Hitman 3 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Metro Exodus 60
+0%
60
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 72
+0%
72
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40
+0%
40
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 37
+0%
37
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 31
+0%
31
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 75
+0%
75
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 72
+0%
72
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 49
+0%
49
+0%

This is how PRO W7600 and GTX 1080 Ti compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1080 Ti is 32% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1080 Ti is 38% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1080 Ti is 32% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 72 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 36.96 48.17
Recency 3 August 2023 10 March 2017
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 11 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 250 Watt

PRO W7600 has an age advantage of 6 years, a 166.7% more advanced lithography process, and 92.3% lower power consumption.

GTX 1080 Ti, on the other hand, has a 30.3% higher aggregate performance score, and a 37.5% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon PRO W7600 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon PRO W7600 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon PRO W7600
Radeon PRO W7600
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 3 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 9996 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1080 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.