Radeon Graphics vs PRO W7500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon PRO W7500 with Radeon Graphics, including specs and performance data.

PRO W7500
2023
8 GB GDDR6, 70 Watt
37.15
+1776%

PRO W7500 outperforms Graphics by a whopping 1776% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking128899
Place by popularitynot in top-10010
Cost-effectiveness evaluation100.00no data
Power efficiency36.379.05
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameNavi 33Renoir
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date3 August 2023 (1 year ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$429 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1792448
Core clock speed1500 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1700 MHz1500 MHz
Number of transistors13,300 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology6 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)70 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate190.442.00
Floating-point processing power12.19 TFLOPS1.344 TFLOPS
ROPs648
TMUs11228
Ray Tracing Cores28no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8IGP
Length216 mmno data
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1344 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth172.0 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort 2.1No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.2no data
Vulkan1.3-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

PRO W7500 37.15
+1776%
Radeon Graphics 1.98

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

PRO W7500 14311
+1773%
Radeon Graphics 764

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 37.15 1.98
Chip lithography 6 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 70 Watt 15 Watt

PRO W7500 has a 1776.3% higher aggregate performance score, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

Graphics, on the other hand, has 366.7% lower power consumption.

The Radeon PRO W7500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Graphics in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon PRO W7500 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon Graphics is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon PRO W7500
Radeon PRO W7500
AMD Radeon Graphics
Radeon Graphics

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 17 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 6389 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.