Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs Radeon PRO W7500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Radeon PRO W7500 Radeon PRO W7600 Radeon PRO W7700 Radeon PRO W7800 Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB Radeon PRO W7900
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q Quadro RTX 5000 X2 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon PRO W7500 with Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, including specs and performance data.

PRO W7500
2023
8 GB GDDR6, 70 Watt
35.35
+4.4%

PRO W7500 outperforms RTX 5000 Max-Q by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

PRO W7500 PRO W7500
RTX 5000 Max-Q RTX 5000 Max-Q

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking141156
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation100.00no data
Power efficiency35.1629.48
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameNavi 33TU104
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date3 August 2023 (1 year ago)27 May 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$429 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17923072
Core clock speed1500 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speed1700 MHz1350 MHz
Number of transistors13,300 million13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)70 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate190.4259.2
Floating-point processing power12.19 TFLOPS8.294 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs112192
Tensor Coresno data384
Ray Tracing Cores2848

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Length216 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1344 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth172.0 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort 2.1No outputs
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model6.76.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.21.2
Vulkan1.31.2.131
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

PRO W7500 35.35
+4.4%
RTX 5000 Max-Q 33.86

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

PRO W7500 13714
+4.4%
RTX 5000 Max-Q 13138

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD110−120
+1.9%
108
−1.9%
1440p65−70
−1.5%
66
+1.5%
4K45−50
+0%
45
+0%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.90no data
1440p6.60no data
4K9.53no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 85
+0%
85
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Metro Exodus 94
+0%
94
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 97
+0%
97
+0%
Valorant 161
+0%
161
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Dota 2 113
+0%
113
+0%
Far Cry 5 79
+0%
79
+0%
Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 108
+0%
108
+0%
Metro Exodus 73
+0%
73
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50
+0%
50
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Valorant 94
+0%
94
+0%
World of Tanks 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75
+0%
75
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Dota 2 118
+0%
118
+0%
Far Cry 5 176
+0%
176
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Valorant 141
+0%
141
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Dota 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 32
+0%
32
+0%
World of Tanks 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 73
+0%
73
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 110
+0%
110
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Metro Exodus 73
+0%
73
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Valorant 98
+0%
98
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Dota 2 79
+0%
79
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 79
+0%
79
+0%
Metro Exodus 26
+0%
26
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 23
+0%
23
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 79
+0%
79
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 47
+0%
47
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Dota 2 99
+0%
99
+0%
Far Cry 5 52
+0%
52
+0%
Fortnite 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 51
+0%
51
+0%

This is how PRO W7500 and RTX 5000 Max-Q compete in popular games:

  • PRO W7500 is 2% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 5000 Max-Q is 2% faster in 1440p
  • A tie in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 64 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 35.35 33.86
Recency 3 August 2023 27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 70 Watt 80 Watt

PRO W7500 has a 4.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 14.3% lower power consumption.

RTX 5000 Max-Q, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon PRO W7500 and Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q.

Be aware that Radeon PRO W7500 is a workstation card while Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon PRO W7500
Radeon PRO W7500
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

PRO W7500 Radeon PRO W7500
vs
RTX A2000 12 GB RTX A2000 12 GB
RTX 5000 Max-Q Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
vs
RTX 4000 Mobile Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
PRO W7500 Radeon PRO W7500
vs
RTX A2000 RTX A2000
RX 7600 RX 7600
vs
GT 740M GT 740M
RX 7600 RX 7600
vs
Go 7800 GTX Go 7800 GTX
RX 7600 RX 7600
vs
7900 GT 7900 GT
RX 7600 RX 7600
vs
Iris Xe Graphics 96EU Iris Xe Graphics 96EU
RX 7600 RX 7600
vs
Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU
PRO W7500 PRO W7500
vs
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
PRO W7500 PRO W7500
vs
RX 7600S RX 7600S
PRO W7600 PRO W7600
vs
GT 730 GT 730
PRO W7600 PRO W7600
vs
RTX 4070 Mobile RTX 4070 Mobile
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
vs
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.1 17 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 48 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.