Radeon RX Vega 3 vs ATI IGP 320M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon IGP 320M and Radeon RX Vega 3, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ATI IGP 320M
2002
0.01

RX Vega 3 outperforms ATI IGP 320M by a whopping 29700% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1520779
Place by popularitynot in top-10084
Power efficiencyno data13.62
ArchitectureRage 7 (2001−2006)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameRS100Picasso
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date5 October 2002 (22 years ago)6 January 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2192
Core clock speed160 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed160 MHz1001 MHz
Number of transistors30 million4,940 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rate0.1612.01
Floating-point processing powerno data0.3844 TFLOPS
ROPs14
TMUs112

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.012 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGL1.44.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI IGP 320M 0.01
RX Vega 3 2.98
+29700%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI IGP 320M 3
RX Vega 3 1149
+38200%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD-0−112

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−133%
7
+133%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−200%
6
+200%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Hitman 3 4−5
−25%
5
+25%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−175%
21−24
+175%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−39.3%
35−40
+39.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Hitman 3 4−5
−100%
8−9
+100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−175%
21−24
+175%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−175%
11
+175%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−88.9%
17
+88.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−39.3%
35−40
+39.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Hitman 3 4−5
−100%
8−9
+100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−12.5%
9
+12.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−125%
9
+125%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+125%
4
−125%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−39.3%
35−40
+39.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 1−2
Hitman 3 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 1−2

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6
+0%
6
+0%
Battlefield 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Metro Exodus 7
+0%
7
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6
+0%
6
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Battlefield 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the ATI IGP 320M is 125% faster.
  • in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX Vega 3 is 300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • ATI IGP 320M is ahead in 1 test (2%)
  • RX Vega 3 is ahead in 28 tests (47%)
  • there's a draw in 30 tests (51%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.01 2.98
Recency 5 October 2002 6 January 2019
Chip lithography 180 nm 14 nm

RX Vega 3 has a 29700% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 16 years, and a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX Vega 3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon IGP 320M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon IGP 320M
Radeon IGP 320M
AMD Radeon RX Vega 3
Radeon RX Vega 3

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 17 votes

Rate Radeon IGP 320M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2000 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.