Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs Radeon HD 7870

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 7870 with Iris Xe Graphics G7, including specs and performance data.

HD 7870
2012
2 GB GDDR5, 175 Watt
12.01
+13.3%

HD 7870 outperforms Iris Xe Graphics G7 by a moderate 13% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking407435
Place by popularitynot in top-10018
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.00no data
Power efficiency4.74no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code namePitcairnTiger Lake Xe
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date5 March 2012 (12 years ago)15 August 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$349 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128096
Core clock speed1000 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,800 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)175 Wattno data
Texture fill rate80.00no data
Floating-point processing power2.56 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs80no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length241 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR4
Maximum RAM amount2 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1200 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth153.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPortno data
Eyefinity+-
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)DirectX 12_1
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 7870 12.01
+13.3%
Iris Xe Graphics G7 10.60

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD 7870 6194
Iris Xe Graphics G7 6710
+8.3%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p84
+20%
70−75
−20%
Full HD66
+20%
55−60
−20%

Cost per frame, $

1080p5.29no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+22.2%
18−20
−22.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%
Elden Ring 35−40
+16.7%
30−33
−16.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+11.4%
35−40
−11.4%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+22.2%
18−20
−22.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+14.3%
40−45
−14.3%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+22.2%
27−30
−22.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+10.7%
27−30
−10.7%
Valorant 45−50
+17.5%
40−45
−17.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+11.4%
35−40
−11.4%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+22.2%
18−20
−22.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%
Dota 2 40−45
+13.2%
35−40
−13.2%
Elden Ring 35−40
+16.7%
30−33
−16.7%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+9.3%
40−45
−9.3%
Fortnite 65−70
+11.3%
60−65
−11.3%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+14.3%
40−45
−14.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
+13.2%
35−40
−13.2%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+13.8%
27−30
−13.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
+11.1%
80−85
−11.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+10.7%
27−30
−10.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+12.5%
30−35
−12.5%
Valorant 45−50
+17.5%
40−45
−17.5%
World of Tanks 160−170
+9.9%
150−160
−9.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+11.4%
35−40
−11.4%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+22.2%
18−20
−22.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%
Dota 2 40−45
+13.2%
35−40
−13.2%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+9.3%
40−45
−9.3%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+14.3%
40−45
−14.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
+11.1%
80−85
−11.1%
Valorant 45−50
+17.5%
40−45
−17.5%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Elden Ring 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+15%
60−65
−15%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
World of Tanks 85−90
+13.3%
75−80
−13.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+17.4%
21−24
−17.4%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+16.7%
24−27
−16.7%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+19%
21−24
−19%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%
Valorant 30−33
+25%
24−27
−25%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Dota 2 21−24
+22.2%
18−20
−22.2%
Elden Ring 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+16.7%
30−33
−16.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Dota 2 21−24
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+15.4%
12−14
−15.4%
Fortnite 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+23.1%
12−14
−23.1%
Valorant 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Far Cry 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Fortnite 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Valorant 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

4K
High Preset

Valorant 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

This is how HD 7870 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 compete in popular games:

  • HD 7870 is 20% faster in 900p
  • HD 7870 is 20% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the HD 7870 is 23% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • HD 7870 is ahead in 34 tests (76%)
  • there's a draw in 11 tests (24%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.01 10.60
Recency 5 March 2012 15 August 2020
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm

HD 7870 has a 13.3% higher aggregate performance score.

Iris Xe Graphics G7, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon HD 7870 is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Xe Graphics G7 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7870 is a desktop card while Iris Xe Graphics G7 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7870
Radeon HD 7870
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7
Iris Xe Graphics G7

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 644 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7870 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2622 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.