RTX A5000 Mobile vs Radeon HD 7640G

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 7640G with RTX A5000 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

HD 7640G
2012
35 Watt
1.02

RTX A5000 Mobile outperforms HD 7640G by a whopping 3455% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1078101
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.3119.20
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameDevastator LiteGA104
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date15 May 2012 (12 years ago)12 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2566144
Core clock speed496 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed685 MHz1575 MHz
Number of transistors1,303 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate10.96302.4
Floating-point processing power0.3507 TFLOPS19.35 TFLOPS
ROPs896
TMUs16192
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Coresno data48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared16 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data448.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.7
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.23.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD 7640G 1.02
RTX A5000 Mobile 36.26
+3455%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 7640G 458
RTX A5000 Mobile 16203
+3438%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD 7640G 656
RTX A5000 Mobile 36164
+5417%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD10
−960%
106
+960%
1440p1−2
−6700%
68
+6700%
4K1−2
−4700%
48
+4700%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−4450%
90−95
+4450%
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3
−4400%
90−95
+4400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−13200%
130−140
+13200%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−4450%
90−95
+4450%
Fortnite 2−3
−8350%
160−170
+8350%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−2417%
150−160
+2417%
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3
−4400%
90−95
+4400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−1600%
150−160
+1600%
Valorant 30−35
−609%
220−230
+609%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−13200%
130−140
+13200%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 24−27
−969%
270−280
+969%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−4450%
90−95
+4450%
Dota 2 16−18
−725%
132
+725%
Fortnite 2−3
−8350%
160−170
+8350%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−2417%
150−160
+2417%
Grand Theft Auto V 0−1 122
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3
−4400%
90−95
+4400%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−7900%
80
+7900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−1600%
150−160
+1600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−2900%
150
+2900%
Valorant 30−35
−609%
220−230
+609%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−13200%
130−140
+13200%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−4450%
90−95
+4450%
Dota 2 16−18
−675%
124
+675%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−2417%
150−160
+2417%
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3
−4400%
90−95
+4400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−1600%
150−160
+1600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−1700%
90
+1700%
Valorant 30−35
−609%
220−230
+609%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−8350%
160−170
+8350%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 6−7
−4383%
260−270
+4383%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−1491%
170−180
+1491%
Valorant 2−3
−12800%
250−260
+12800%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−4500%
45−50
+4500%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−7800%
79
+7800%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−3633%
110−120
+3633%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−7300%
70−75
+7300%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−5050%
100−110
+5050%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−407%
76
+407%
Valorant 6−7
−3850%
230−240
+3850%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 21−24
Dota 2 0−1 107
Far Cry 5 1−2
−4300%
44
+4300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−2550%
50−55
+2550%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−2450%
50−55
+2450%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Far Cry 5 93
+0%
93
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Far Cry 5 90
+0%
90
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 85
+0%
85
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 82
+0%
82
+0%
Metro Exodus 44
+0%
44
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Metro Exodus 26
+0%
26
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 58
+0%
58
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

This is how HD 7640G and RTX A5000 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX A5000 Mobile is 960% faster in 1080p
  • RTX A5000 Mobile is 6700% faster in 1440p
  • RTX A5000 Mobile is 4700% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX A5000 Mobile is 13200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX A5000 Mobile is ahead in 42 tests (67%)
  • there's a draw in 21 test (33%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.02 36.26
Recency 15 May 2012 12 April 2021
Chip lithography 32 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 150 Watt

HD 7640G has 328.6% lower power consumption.

RTX A5000 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 3454.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A5000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7640G in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7640G is a notebook graphics card while RTX A5000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7640G
Radeon HD 7640G
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile
RTX A5000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 166 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7640G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 56 votes

Rate RTX A5000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7640G or RTX A5000 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.