Radeon Pro Vega 48 vs ATI HD 5850

#ad 
Buy
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 5850 with Radeon Pro Vega 48, including specs and performance data.

ATI HD 5850
2009
1 GB GDDR5, 151 Watt
4.45

Pro Vega 48 outperforms ATI HD 5850 by a whopping 468% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking638207
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.56no data
Power efficiency2.34no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameCypressVega 10
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date30 September 2009 (15 years ago)19 March 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$299 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores14403072
Core clock speed725 MHz1200 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1300 MHz
Number of transistors2,154 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)151 Wattno data
Texture fill rate52.20249.6
Floating-point processing power2.088 TFLOPS7.987 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs72192

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length241 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2
Maximum RAM amount1 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz786 MHz
Memory bandwidth128.0 GB/s402.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.4
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.0
VulkanN/A1.1.125

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

ATI HD 5850 4.45
Pro Vega 48 25.29
+468%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI HD 5850 1988
Pro Vega 48 11299
+468%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p59
−408%
300−350
+408%
Full HD57
−426%
300−350
+426%

Cost per frame, $

1080p5.25no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 12−14
−442%
65−70
+442%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−424%
110−120
+424%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−450%
55−60
+450%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 12−14
−442%
65−70
+442%
Battlefield 5 20−22
−450%
110−120
+450%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−424%
110−120
+424%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−450%
55−60
+450%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−436%
75−80
+436%
Fortnite 27−30
−436%
150−160
+436%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−445%
120−130
+445%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
−442%
65−70
+442%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−426%
100−105
+426%
Valorant 60−65
−400%
300−310
+400%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 12−14
−442%
65−70
+442%
Battlefield 5 20−22
−450%
110−120
+450%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−424%
110−120
+424%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 80−85
−442%
450−500
+442%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−450%
55−60
+450%
Dota 2 40−45
−461%
230−240
+461%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−436%
75−80
+436%
Fortnite 27−30
−436%
150−160
+436%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−445%
120−130
+445%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
−442%
65−70
+442%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−463%
90−95
+463%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−456%
50−55
+456%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−426%
100−105
+426%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−438%
70−75
+438%
Valorant 60−65
−400%
300−310
+400%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
−450%
110−120
+450%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−450%
55−60
+450%
Dota 2 40−45
−461%
230−240
+461%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−436%
75−80
+436%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−445%
120−130
+445%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−426%
100−105
+426%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−438%
70−75
+438%
Valorant 60−65
−400%
300−310
+400%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 27−30
−436%
150−160
+436%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−400%
35−40
+400%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40
−468%
210−220
+468%
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6
−440%
27−30
+440%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−433%
16−18
+433%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−459%
190−200
+459%
Valorant 50−55
−466%
300−310
+466%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−456%
50−55
+456%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−442%
65−70
+442%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−400%
35−40
+400%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 9−10
−456%
50−55
+456%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−459%
95−100
+459%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1
Valorant 24−27
−442%
130−140
+442%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Dota 2 16−18
−463%
90−95
+463%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−440%
27−30
+440%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
−440%
27−30
+440%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
−440%
27−30
+440%

This is how ATI HD 5850 and Pro Vega 48 compete in popular games:

  • Pro Vega 48 is 408% faster in 900p
  • Pro Vega 48 is 426% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.45 25.29
Recency 30 September 2009 19 March 2019
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm

Pro Vega 48 has a 468.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro Vega 48 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 5850 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 5850 is a desktop card while Radeon Pro Vega 48 is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 5850
Radeon HD 5850
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48
Radeon Pro Vega 48

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 270 votes

Rate Radeon HD 5850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 76 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega 48 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 5850 or Radeon Pro Vega 48, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.