Radeon 680M vs ATI HD 5770

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 5770 with Radeon 680M, including specs and performance data.

ATI HD 5770
2009
1 GB GDDR5, 108 Watt
4.43

680M outperforms ATI HD 5770 by a whopping 238% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking668353
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.89no data
Power efficiency2.8120.54
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameJuniperRembrandt+
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date13 October 2009 (15 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$159 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores800768
Core clock speed850 MHz2000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2200 MHz
Number of transistors1,040 million13,100 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)108 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate34.00105.6
Floating-point processing power1.36 TFLOPS3.379 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs4048
Ray Tracing Coresno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length208 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed4800 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth76.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.7
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI HD 5770 4.43
Radeon 680M 14.99
+238%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI HD 5770 1705
Radeon 680M 5776
+239%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

ATI HD 5770 2410
Radeon 680M 10371
+330%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

ATI HD 5770 11699
Radeon 680M 34600
+196%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p24
−233%
80−85
+233%
Full HD50
+35.1%
37
−35.1%
1440p5−6
−240%
17
+240%
4K3−4
−267%
11
+267%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.18no data
1440p31.80no data
4K53.00no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−388%
39
+388%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−225%
35−40
+225%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−850%
38
+850%
Battlefield 5 10−12
−418%
55−60
+418%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−250%
35−40
+250%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−263%
29
+263%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−356%
40−45
+356%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−292%
45−50
+292%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−307%
110−120
+307%
Hitman 3 10−11
−220%
32
+220%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
−197%
85−90
+197%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−567%
60−65
+567%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−292%
45−50
+292%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−256%
55−60
+256%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−93.2%
85−90
+93.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−225%
35−40
+225%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−675%
31
+675%
Battlefield 5 10−12
−418%
55−60
+418%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−250%
35−40
+250%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−163%
21
+163%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−356%
40−45
+356%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−292%
45−50
+292%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−307%
110−120
+307%
Hitman 3 10−11
−200%
30
+200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
−197%
85−90
+197%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−567%
60−65
+567%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−292%
45−50
+292%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−194%
47
+194%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−135%
40−45
+135%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−93.2%
85−90
+93.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−225%
35−40
+225%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−575%
27
+575%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−250%
35−40
+250%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−113%
17
+113%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−356%
40−45
+356%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−307%
110−120
+307%
Hitman 3 10−11
−170%
27
+170%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
−48.3%
43
+48.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−150%
40
+150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−41.2%
24
+41.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+144%
18
−144%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−292%
45−50
+292%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
−313%
30−35
+313%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−286%
27−30
+286%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−350%
18−20
+350%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−375%
18−20
+375%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−450%
11
+450%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−300%
20−22
+300%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−1243%
90−95
+1243%
Hitman 3 9−10
−122%
20−22
+122%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−250%
35−40
+250%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−3100%
30−35
+3100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−467%
17
+467%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−275%
100−110
+275%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−263%
27−30
+263%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−467%
16−18
+467%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−333%
12−14
+333%
Hitman 3 1−2
−1200%
12−14
+1200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
−2867%
85−90
+2867%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−1700%
18−20
+1700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 13

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 4
Far Cry 5 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−700%
24−27
+700%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−200%
14−16
+200%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27
+0%
27
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14
+0%
14
+0%

This is how ATI HD 5770 and Radeon 680M compete in popular games:

  • Radeon 680M is 233% faster in 900p
  • ATI HD 5770 is 35% faster in 1080p
  • Radeon 680M is 240% faster in 1440p
  • Radeon 680M is 267% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the ATI HD 5770 is 144% faster.
  • in Metro Exodus, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Radeon 680M is 3100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • ATI HD 5770 is ahead in 1 test (1%)
  • Radeon 680M is ahead in 66 tests (94%)
  • there's a draw in 3 tests (4%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.43 14.99
Recency 13 October 2009 3 January 2023
Chip lithography 40 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 108 Watt 50 Watt

Radeon 680M has a 238.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, a 566.7% more advanced lithography process, and 116% lower power consumption.

The Radeon 680M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 5770 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 5770 is a desktop card while Radeon 680M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 5770
Radeon HD 5770
AMD Radeon 680M
Radeon 680M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 673 votes

Rate Radeon HD 5770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 953 votes

Rate Radeon 680M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.