Tesla V100 SXM2 vs Radeon E9171 MCM

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Volta (2017−2020)
GPU code nameLexaGV100
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date3 October 2017 (7 years ago)21 June 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5125120
Core clock speed1124 MHz1370 MHz
Boost clock speed1219 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,200 million21,100 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate39.01438.4
Floating-point processing power1.248 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16128
TMUs32320

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2
Maximum RAM amount4 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1758 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s900.1 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12.0
Shader Model6.45.0
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA-7.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 October 2017 21 June 2017
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 250 Watt

E9171 MCM has an age advantage of 3 months, and 525% lower power consumption.

Tesla V100 SXM2, on the other hand, has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon E9171 MCM and Tesla V100 SXM2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon E9171 MCM is a notebook card while Tesla V100 SXM2 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon E9171 MCM
Radeon E9171 MCM
NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2
Tesla V100 SXM2

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Radeon E9171 MCM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 44 votes

Rate Tesla V100 SXM2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.