Arc A370M vs Radeon 625

Place in the ranking	813	400
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	3.81	25.95
Architecture	GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)	Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code name	Polaris 24	DG2-128
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	13 May 2019 (5 years ago)	30 March 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	1024
Core clock speed	730 MHz	300 MHz
Boost clock speed	1024 MHz	1550 MHz
Number of transistors	1,550 million	7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	35 Watt
Texture fill rate	24.58	99.20
Floating-point processing power	0.7864 TFLOPS	3.174 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	32
TMUs	24	64
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	900 MHz	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB/s	112.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-
Resizable BAR	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.3	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Radeon 625 2.40

Arc A370M 11.45
+377%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon 625 1073

Arc A370M 5115
+377%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	8−9 −388%	39 +388%
1440p	4−5 −400%	20 +400%
4K	7−8 −386%	34 +386%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart	7−8 −700%	56 +700%
Counter-Strike 2	6−7 −1050%	65−70 +1050%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −820%	46 +820%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart	7−8 −500%	42 +500%
Battlefield 5	8−9 −575%	50−55 +575%
Counter-Strike 2	6−7 −1050%	65−70 +1050%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −640%	37 +640%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −880%	49 +880%
Fortnite	12−14 −454%	70−75 +454%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −308%	50−55 +308%
Forza Horizon 5	4−5 −875%	35−40 +875%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	12−14 −246%	45−50 +246%
Valorant	40−45 −145%	100−110 +145%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart	7−8 −243%	24 +243%
Battlefield 5	8−9 −575%	50−55 +575%
Counter-Strike 2	6−7 −1050%	65−70 +1050%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	50−55 −252%	170−180 +252%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −400%	25 +400%
Dota 2	24−27 −162%	68 +162%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −820%	46 +820%
Fortnite	12−14 −454%	70−75 +454%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −308%	50−55 +308%
Forza Horizon 5	4−5 −875%	35−40 +875%
Grand Theft Auto V	7−8 −314%	29 +314%
Metro Exodus	5−6 −580%	34 +580%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	12−14 −246%	45−50 +246%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8−9 −563%	53 +563%
Valorant	40−45 −145%	100−110 +145%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 −575%	50−55 +575%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −320%	21 +320%
Dota 2	24−27 −154%	66 +154%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −760%	43 +760%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −308%	50−55 +308%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	12−14 −246%	45−50 +246%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8−9 −225%	26 +225%
Valorant	40−45 −145%	100−110 +145%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite

12−14

−454%

70−75
+454%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	3−4 −700%	24−27 +700%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	18−20 −395%	90−95 +395%
Grand Theft Auto V	1−2 −1000%	11 +1000%
Metro Exodus	0−1	20
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	21−24 −339%	100−110 +339%
Valorant	24−27 −454%	130−140 +454%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −450%	10−12 +450%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −625%	29 +625%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −400%	30−33 +400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −400%	20−22 +400%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite

5−6

−440%

27−30
+440%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart	2−3 −400%	10−11 +400%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −60%	24−27 +60%
Valorant	12−14 −415%	65−70 +415%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%
Dota 2	7−8 −471%	40 +471%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −333%	12−14 +333%
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 −1000%	21−24 +1000%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	3−4 −300%	12−14 +300%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite

3−4

−300%

12−14
+300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5

30−35

+0%

30−35

+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Metro Exodus	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%

This is how Radeon 625 and Arc A370M compete in popular games:

Arc A370M is 388% faster in 1080p
Arc A370M is 400% faster in 1440p
Arc A370M is 386% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the Arc A370M is 1050% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Arc A370M is ahead in 56 tests (90%)
there's a draw in 6 tests (10%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	2.40	11.45
Recency	13 May 2019	30 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	35 Watt

Arc A370M has a 377.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 366.7% more advanced lithography process, and 42.9% lower power consumption.

The Arc A370M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 625 in performance tests.