RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs RTX A500 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX A500 Mobile with RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

RTX A500 Mobile
2022
4 GB GDDR6, 60 Watt
17.56

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation outperforms RTX A500 Mobile by a whopping 207% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking31148
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency20.0652.86
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGA107SAD104
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date22 March 2022 (2 years ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20486144
Core clock speed832 MHz720 MHz
Boost clock speed1537 MHz1560 MHz
Number of transistorsno data35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt (20 - 60 Watt TGP)70 Watt
Texture fill rate98.37299.5
Floating-point processing power6.296 TFLOPS19.17 TFLOPS
ROPs4880
TMUs64192
Tensor Cores64192
Ray Tracing Cores1648

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB20 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit160 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s280.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.68.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX A500 Mobile 17.56
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 53.97
+207%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX A500 Mobile 6767
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 20796
+207%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD43
−202%
130−140
+202%
1440p25
−200%
75−80
+200%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−192%
70−75
+192%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−186%
100−105
+186%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
−200%
75−80
+200%
Battlefield 5 50−55
−194%
150−160
+194%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
−206%
95−100
+206%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−192%
70−75
+192%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−206%
110−120
+206%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
−186%
120−130
+186%
Forza Horizon 4 100−105
−200%
300−310
+200%
Hitman 3 30−33
−200%
90−95
+200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
−195%
230−240
+195%
Metro Exodus 50−55
−202%
160−170
+202%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−202%
130−140
+202%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
−194%
150−160
+194%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
−200%
240−250
+200%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−186%
100−105
+186%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
−200%
75−80
+200%
Battlefield 5 50−55
−194%
150−160
+194%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
−206%
95−100
+206%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−192%
70−75
+192%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−206%
110−120
+206%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
−186%
120−130
+186%
Forza Horizon 4 100−105
−200%
300−310
+200%
Hitman 3 30−33
−200%
90−95
+200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
−195%
230−240
+195%
Metro Exodus 50−55
−202%
160−170
+202%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−202%
130−140
+202%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 62
−206%
190−200
+206%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
−197%
110−120
+197%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
−200%
240−250
+200%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−186%
100−105
+186%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
−200%
75−80
+200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
−206%
95−100
+206%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−192%
70−75
+192%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−206%
110−120
+206%
Forza Horizon 4 100−105
−200%
300−310
+200%
Hitman 3 30−33
−200%
90−95
+200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
−195%
230−240
+195%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 54
−196%
160−170
+196%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 29
−193%
85−90
+193%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
−200%
240−250
+200%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−202%
130−140
+202%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−33
−200%
90−95
+200%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−192%
70−75
+192%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−181%
45−50
+181%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
−169%
35−40
+169%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
−194%
50−55
+194%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−200%
24−27
+200%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−206%
55−60
+206%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−205%
250−260
+205%
Hitman 3 18−20
−206%
55−60
+206%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−197%
95−100
+197%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−196%
80−85
+196%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 39
−182%
110−120
+182%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−194%
50−55
+194%
Watch Dogs: Legion 95−100
−205%
290−300
+205%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−200%
75−80
+200%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
−200%
45−50
+200%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
−173%
30−33
+173%
Hitman 3 10−12
−173%
30−33
+173%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
−195%
230−240
+195%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−200%
45−50
+200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−200%
45−50
+200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−200%
27−30
+200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
−200%
21−24
+200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−200%
24−27
+200%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−200%
24−27
+200%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−186%
60−65
+186%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−200%
45−50
+200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−186%
40−45
+186%

This is how RTX A500 Mobile and RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is 202% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is 200% faster in 1440p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.56 53.97
Recency 22 March 2022 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 20 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 70 Watt

RTX A500 Mobile has 16.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation, on the other hand, has a 207.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 months, a 400% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 60% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX A500 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that RTX A500 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile
RTX A500 Mobile
NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 88 votes

Rate RTX A500 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 49 votes

Rate RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.