Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS vs RTX 6000 Ada Generation

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX 6000 Ada Generation with Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS, including specs and performance data.

RTX 6000 Ada Generation
2022
48 GB GDDR6, 300 Watt
74.15
+545%

RTX 6000 Ada Generation outperforms Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS by a whopping 545% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking15413
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.01no data
Power efficiency17.2420.05
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)no data
GPU code nameAD102no data
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date3 December 2022 (1 year ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$6,799 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores181761536
Core clock speed915 MHzno data
Boost clock speed2505 MHz1500 MHz
Number of transistors76,300 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology5 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate1,423no data
Floating-point processing power91.06 TFLOPSno data
ROPs192no data
TMUs568no data
Tensor Cores568no data
Ray Tracing Cores142no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 16-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6LPDDR5x
Maximum RAM amount48 GBno data
Memory bus width384 Bitno data
Memory clock speed2500 MHz8448 MHz
Memory bandwidth960.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort 1.4ano data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12_1
Shader Model6.8no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.3-
CUDA8.9-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 6000 Ada Generation 74.15
+545%
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS 11.50

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 6000 Ada Generation 70850
+903%
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS 7061

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RTX 6000 Ada Generation 126448
+426%
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS 24058

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 6000 Ada Generation 36679
+425%
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS 6982

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD186
+365%
40
−365%
1440p161
+571%
24−27
−571%
4K117
+550%
18−20
−550%

Cost per frame, $

1080p36.55no data
1440p42.23no data
4K58.11no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 150−160
+614%
21−24
−614%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 130−140
+633%
18−20
−633%
Battlefield 5 230−240
+571%
35−40
−571%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 120−130
+567%
18−20
−567%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+550%
18−20
−550%
Far Cry New Dawn 180−190
+567%
27−30
−567%
Forza Horizon 4 240−250
+591%
35−40
−591%
Hitman 3 120−130
+617%
18−20
−617%
Horizon Zero Dawn 260−270
+560%
40−45
−560%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+546%
24−27
−546%
Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+583%
18−20
−583%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 300−350
+593%
45−50
−593%
Watch Dogs: Legion 150−160
+629%
21−24
−629%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 150−160
+614%
21−24
−614%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 130−140
+633%
18−20
−633%
Battlefield 5 230−240
+571%
35−40
−571%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 120−130
+567%
18−20
−567%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+550%
18−20
−550%
Far Cry New Dawn 180−190
+567%
27−30
−567%
Forza Horizon 4 240−250
+591%
35−40
−591%
Hitman 3 120−130
+617%
18−20
−617%
Horizon Zero Dawn 260−270
+560%
40−45
−560%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+546%
24−27
−546%
Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+583%
18−20
−583%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 300−350
+593%
45−50
−593%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 150−160
+563%
24−27
−563%
Watch Dogs: Legion 150−160
+629%
21−24
−629%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 150−160
+614%
21−24
−614%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 130−140
+633%
18−20
−633%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 120−130
+567%
18−20
−567%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+550%
18−20
−550%
Forza Horizon 4 240−250
+591%
35−40
−591%
Hitman 3 120−130
+617%
18−20
−617%
Horizon Zero Dawn 260−270
+560%
40−45
−560%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 300−350
+593%
45−50
−593%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 260
+550%
40−45
−550%
Watch Dogs: Legion 150−160
+629%
21−24
−629%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+583%
18−20
−583%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 160−170
+592%
24−27
−592%
Far Cry New Dawn 110−120
+600%
16−18
−600%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 85−90
+625%
12−14
−625%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 90−95
+571%
14−16
−571%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80−85
+583%
12−14
−583%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+600%
12−14
−600%
Forza Horizon 4 270−280
+578%
40−45
−578%
Hitman 3 100−110
+569%
16−18
−569%
Horizon Zero Dawn 180−190
+600%
27−30
−600%
Metro Exodus 99
+607%
14−16
−607%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 210−220
+607%
30−33
−607%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 219
+630%
30−33
−630%
Watch Dogs: Legion 240−250
+586%
35−40
−586%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
+556%
18−20
−556%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+633%
12−14
−633%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+590%
10−11
−590%
Hitman 3 65−70
+550%
10−11
−550%
Horizon Zero Dawn 87
+625%
12−14
−625%
Metro Exodus 110−120
+561%
18−20
−561%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 184
+581%
27−30
−581%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 60−65
+578%
9−10
−578%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55−60
+556%
9−10
−556%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+550%
8−9
−550%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+614%
7−8
−614%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+633%
18−20
−633%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 110−120
+556%
18−20
−556%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+586%
7−8
−586%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 80−85
+583%
12−14
−583%

This is how RTX 6000 Ada Generation and Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS compete in popular games:

  • RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 365% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 571% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 550% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 74.15 11.50
Chip lithography 5 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 40 Watt

RTX 6000 Ada Generation has a 544.8% higher aggregate performance score.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS, on the other hand, has a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 650% lower power consumption.

The RTX 6000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS in performance tests.

Be aware that RTX 6000 Ada Generation is a workstation card while Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 83 votes

Rate RTX 6000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.8 12 votes

Rate Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.