HD Graphics 2000 vs GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile and HD Graphics 2000, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
2021
4 GB GDDR6, 60 Watt
23.55
+4343%

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile outperforms HD Graphics 2000 by a whopping 4343% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking2341227
Place by popularity56not in top-100
Power efficiency28.12no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Generation 6.0 (2011)
GPU code nameGN20-P0Sandy Bridge GT1
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date11 May 2021 (3 years ago)1 February 2011 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores204848
Core clock speed1238 MHz850 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHz1350 MHz
Number of transistorsno data189 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt (35 - 80 Watt TGP)unknown
Texture fill rateno data8.100
Floating-point processing powerno data0.1296 TFLOPS
ROPsno data1
TMUsno data6

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed12000 MHzSystem Shared
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_211.1 (10_1)
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGLno data3.1
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile 23.55
+4343%
HD Graphics 2000 0.53

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile 43216
+4726%
HD Graphics 2000 896

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD64
+482%
11
−482%
1440p440−1
4K290−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 42
+367%
9−10
−367%
Cyberpunk 2077 66
+2100%
3−4
−2100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+7400%
1−2
−7400%
Counter-Strike 2 38
+322%
9−10
−322%
Cyberpunk 2077 46
+1433%
3−4
−1433%
Forza Horizon 4 115
+1817%
6−7
−1817%
Forza Horizon 5 80
+7900%
1−2
−7900%
Metro Exodus 83
+8200%
1−2
−8200%
Red Dead Redemption 2 87
+1640%
5−6
−1640%
Valorant 133
+6550%
2−3
−6550%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+7400%
1−2
−7400%
Counter-Strike 2 30
+233%
9−10
−233%
Cyberpunk 2077 37
+1133%
3−4
−1133%
Dota 2 96
+4700%
2−3
−4700%
Far Cry 5 73
+813%
8−9
−813%
Fortnite 120−130 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 94
+1467%
6−7
−1467%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
+6400%
1−2
−6400%
Grand Theft Auto V 86
+8500%
1−2
−8500%
Metro Exodus 57
+5600%
1−2
−5600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+1838%
8−9
−1838%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+980%
5−6
−980%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
+1480%
5−6
−1480%
Valorant 68
+6700%
1−2
−6700%
World of Tanks 250−260
+1500%
16−18
−1500%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+7400%
1−2
−7400%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+400%
9−10
−400%
Cyberpunk 2077 31
+933%
3−4
−933%
Dota 2 112
+5500%
2−3
−5500%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+838%
8−9
−838%
Forza Horizon 4 81
+1250%
6−7
−1250%
Forza Horizon 5 55
+5400%
1−2
−5400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+1838%
8−9
−1838%
Valorant 95−100
+4800%
2−3
−4800%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 48
+4700%
1−2
−4700%
Grand Theft Auto V 48
+4700%
1−2
−4700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+5733%
3−4
−5733%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24 0−1
World of Tanks 160−170
+16200%
1−2
−16200%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+4800%
1−2
−4800%
Cyberpunk 2077 17
+467%
3−4
−467%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+1675%
4−5
−1675%
Forza Horizon 4 56
+5500%
1−2
−5500%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40 0−1
Metro Exodus 52
+5100%
1−2
−5100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+800%
4−5
−800%
Valorant 65−70
+1220%
5−6
−1220%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−12 0−1
Dota 2 44
+193%
14−16
−193%
Grand Theft Auto V 44
+193%
14−16
−193%
Metro Exodus 17 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
+7400%
1−2
−7400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 44
+193%
14−16
−193%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 10−12 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 5
+150%
2−3
−150%
Dota 2 62
+313%
14−16
−313%
Far Cry 5 30−35 0−1
Fortnite 30−33 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 34 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 21−24 0−1
Valorant 30−35
+3100%
1−2
−3100%

This is how RTX 3050 4GB Mobile and HD Graphics 2000 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is 482% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in World of Tanks, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is 16200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 3050 4GB Mobile surpassed HD Graphics 2000 in all 32 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 23.55 0.53
Recency 11 May 2021 1 February 2011
Chip lithography 8 nm 32 nm

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile has a 4343.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 2000 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
Intel HD Graphics 2000
HD Graphics 2000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1432 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 1362 votes

Rate HD Graphics 2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.