Radeon RX 9070 XT vs Quadro T500 Mobile

Quadro T400 Mobile Quadro T500 Mobile Quadro T600 Mobile Quadro T1000 Mobile Quadro T1000 Max-Q Quadro T1200 Max-Q Quadro T1200 Mobile Quadro T2000 Mobile Quadro T2000 Max-Q T500 Max-Q T550 Mobile T600 Max-Q
VS
Radeon RX 5700 Radeon RX 5700 XT Radeon RX 6600 Radeon RX 6600 XT Radeon RX 6700 XT Radeon RX 7600 Radeon RX 7600 XT Radeon RX 7800 XT Radeon RX 7900 XTX Radeon RX 9060 XT Radeon RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070 XT

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro T500 Mobile with Radeon RX 9070 XT, including specs and performance data.

T500 Mobile
2020
2 GB GDDR6, 18 Watt
7.76

RX 9070 XT outperforms T500 Mobile by a whopping 669% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

T500 Mobile Quadro T500
RX 9070 XT RX 9070 XT

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking49930
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data59.99
Power efficiency34.2015.58
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)RDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code nameTU117Navi 48
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date2 December 2020 (4 years ago)6 March 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8964096
Core clock speed1365 MHz1660 MHz
Boost clock speed1695 MHz2970 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million53,900 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt304 Watt
Texture fill rate94.92760.3
Floating-point processing power3.037 TFLOPS48.66 TFLOPS
ROPs32128
TMUs56256
Tensor Coresno data128
Ray Tracing Coresno data64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB16 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz2518 MHz
Memory bandwidth80 GB/s644.6 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1a
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.2
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA7.5-
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD36
−650%
270−280
+650%
1440p15
−633%
110−120
+633%
4K17
−665%
130−140
+665%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.22
1440pno data5.45
4Kno data4.61

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
−368%
170−180
+368%
Far Cry 5 30
−477%
170−180
+477%
Fortnite 50−55
−492%
300−350
+492%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−584%
250−260
+584%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
−644%
180−190
+644%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
−490%
170−180
+490%
Valorant 80−85
−330%
350−400
+330%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
−368%
170−180
+368%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
−112%
270−280
+112%
Dota 2 90
−622%
650−700
+622%
Far Cry 5 28
−518%
170−180
+518%
Fortnite 50−55
−492%
300−350
+492%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−584%
250−260
+584%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
−644%
180−190
+644%
Grand Theft Auto V 31
−439%
160−170
+439%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−853%
160−170
+853%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
−490%
170−180
+490%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28
−854%
260−270
+854%
Valorant 80−85
−330%
350−400
+330%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
−368%
170−180
+368%
Dota 2 75
−633%
550−600
+633%
Far Cry 5 27
−541%
170−180
+541%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−584%
250−260
+584%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
−490%
170−180
+490%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 19
−1305%
260−270
+1305%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 50−55
−492%
300−350
+492%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 60−65
−672%
450−500
+672%
Grand Theft Auto V 13
−938%
130−140
+938%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−1100%
100−110
+1100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−669%
100−105
+669%
Valorant 95−100
−361%
400−450
+361%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−747%
160−170
+747%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−806%
150−160
+806%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
−985%
210−220
+985%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 16−18
−788%
150−160
+788%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14
−1014%
150−160
+1014%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−1650%
70−75
+1650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−1538%
130−140
+1538%
Valorant 40−45
−650%
300−350
+650%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
−1200%
110−120
+1200%
Dota 2 28
−650%
210−220
+650%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−1033%
100−110
+1033%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−1107%
160−170
+1107%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−1100%
95−100
+1100%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 8−9
−888%
75−80
+888%

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Valorant 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

This is how T500 Mobile and RX 9070 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 9070 XT is 650% faster in 1080p
  • RX 9070 XT is 633% faster in 1440p
  • RX 9070 XT is 665% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RX 9070 XT is 1650% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 9070 XT is ahead in 41 test (68%)
  • there's a draw in 19 tests (32%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 7.76 59.71
Recency 2 December 2020 6 March 2025
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 304 Watt

T500 Mobile has 1588.9% lower power consumption.

RX 9070 XT, on the other hand, has a 669.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 140% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 9070 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T500 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro T500 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while Radeon RX 9070 XT is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro T500 Mobile
Quadro T500
AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT
Radeon RX 9070 XT
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

T500 Mobile Quadro T500 Mobile
vs
Pro W5500M Radeon Pro W5500M
RX 9070 XT Radeon RX 9070 XT
vs
RTX 3090 GeForce RTX 3090
T500 Mobile Quadro T500 Mobile
vs
Pro 560 Radeon Pro 560
A100 SXM4 80 GB A100 SXM4 80 GB
vs
RX 9070 RX 9070
A100 SXM4 80 GB A100 SXM4 80 GB
vs
RTX 5090 D RTX 5090 D
GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB
vs
RX 9070 XT RX 9070 XT
GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB
vs
RX 9070 RX 9070
GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB 1050 Mobile 3 GB
vs
RTX 5090 D 5090 D
T500 Mobile T500 Mobile
vs
RX 9070 RX 9070
T500 Mobile T500 Mobile
vs
RTX 5090 D RTX 5090 D
RTX A5000 RTX A5000
vs
RX 9070 XT RX 9070 XT
RTX A5000 RTX A5000
vs
RX 9070 RX 9070
RTX A5000 RTX A5000
vs
RTX 5090 D RTX 5090 D

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.1 111 votes

Rate Quadro T500 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 972 votes

Rate Radeon RX 9070 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro T500 Mobile or Radeon RX 9070 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.