Radeon Pro V520 vs A100 SXM4 80 GB

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated172
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data9.84
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameGA100Navi 12
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date16 November 2020 (4 years ago)1 December 2020 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores69122304
Core clock speed1095 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed1410 MHz1600 MHz
Number of transistors54,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)400 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate609.1230.4
Floating-point processing power19.49 TFLOPS7.373 TFLOPS
ROPs16064
TMUs432144
Tensor Cores432no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
WidthIGPIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2eHBM2
Maximum RAM amount80 GB8 GB
Memory bus width5120 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed1593 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth2,039 GB/s512.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/A12 (12_1)
Shader ModelN/A6.5
OpenGLN/A4.6
OpenCL2.02.2
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA8.0-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 80 GB 8 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 400 Watt 225 Watt

A100 SXM4 80 GB has a 900% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Pro V520, on the other hand, has 77.8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between A100 SXM4 80 GB and Radeon Pro V520. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB
A100 SXM4 80 GB
AMD Radeon Pro V520
Radeon Pro V520

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 58 votes

Rate A100 SXM4 80 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 15 votes

Rate Radeon Pro V520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.