Arc 8-Core iGPU vs Quadro T2000 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro T2000 Mobile with Arc 8-Core iGPU, including specs and performance data.

T2000 Mobile
2019
4 GB GDDR5, 60 Watt
20.77
+12.1%

T2000 Mobile outperforms Arc 8-Core iGPU by a moderate 12% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking269301
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency23.83no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Xe LPG (2023)
GPU code nameTU117Meteor Lake iGPU
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date27 May 2019 (5 years ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10248
Core clock speed1575 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1785 MHz2300 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Wattno data
Texture fill rate114.2no data
Floating-point processing power3.656 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs64no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed2000 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth128.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12_2
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

T2000 Mobile 20.77
+12.1%
Arc 8-Core iGPU 18.52

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

T2000 Mobile 13524
+9.3%
Arc 8-Core iGPU 12375

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD40−45
+11.1%
36
−11.1%
1440p21−24
+5%
20
−5%
4K16−18
+6.7%
15
−6.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+42.3%
26
−42.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+17.1%
35−40
−17.1%
Elden Ring 65−70
+120%
30
−120%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+11.9%
55−60
−11.9%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+60.9%
23
−60.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+17.1%
35−40
−17.1%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+23.9%
71
−23.9%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+40%
40
−40%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+9.3%
40−45
−9.3%
Valorant 80−85
+12%
75−80
−12%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+11.9%
55−60
−11.9%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+60.9%
23
−60.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+17.1%
35−40
−17.1%
Dota 2 70−75
+192%
25
−192%
Elden Ring 65−70
+13.8%
55−60
−13.8%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+100%
34
−100%
Fortnite 100−110
+10.1%
95−100
−10.1%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+49.2%
59
−49.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75
+192%
25
−192%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+93.1%
29
−93.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+8.7%
120−130
−8.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+9.3%
40−45
−9.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+13.8%
55−60
−13.8%
Valorant 80−85
+12%
75−80
−12%
World of Tanks 230−240
+6.3%
220−230
−6.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+11.9%
55−60
−11.9%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+12.1%
30−35
−12.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+17.1%
35−40
−17.1%
Dota 2 70−75
+12.3%
65−70
−12.3%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+6.3%
60−65
−6.3%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+91.3%
46
−91.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+8.7%
120−130
−8.7%
Valorant 80−85
+12%
75−80
−12%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 30−35
+200%
11
−200%
Elden Ring 35−40
+16.7%
30−33
−16.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+209%
11
−209%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+3%
160−170
−3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+11.8%
16−18
−11.8%
World of Tanks 140−150
+10.2%
120−130
−10.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+10.5%
35−40
−10.5%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+13.3%
14−16
−13.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+18.8%
45−50
−18.8%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+80%
30
−80%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+11.9%
40−45
−11.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+16%
24−27
−16%
Valorant 50−55
+14.9%
45−50
−14.9%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+13.3%
14−16
−13.3%
Dota 2 35−40
+289%
9
−289%
Elden Ring 14−16
+15.4%
12−14
−15.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
+289%
9
−289%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+15.4%
12−14
−15.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+12.7%
55−60
−12.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+289%
9
−289%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+13.3%
14−16
−13.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Dota 2 35−40
+16.7%
30−33
−16.7%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+12.5%
24−27
−12.5%
Fortnite 24−27
+13.6%
21−24
−13.6%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+107%
15
−107%
Valorant 24−27
+13.6%
21−24
−13.6%

This is how T2000 Mobile and Arc 8-Core iGPU compete in popular games:

  • T2000 Mobile is 11% faster in 1080p
  • T2000 Mobile is 5% faster in 1440p
  • T2000 Mobile is 7% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Dota 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the T2000 Mobile is 289% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, T2000 Mobile surpassed Arc 8-Core iGPU in all 55 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.77 18.52
Recency 27 May 2019 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm

T2000 Mobile has a 12.1% higher aggregate performance score.

Arc 8-Core iGPU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 140% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro T2000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc 8-Core iGPU in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro T2000 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while Arc 8-Core iGPU is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
Quadro T2000 Mobile
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
Arc 8-Core iGPU

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 398 votes

Rate Quadro T2000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 50 votes

Rate Arc 8-Core iGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.