RTX A5500 Mobile vs Quadro RTX 8000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
CMP 50HX GRID RTX T10-4 GRID RTX T10-8 GRID RTX T10-16 Quadro RTX 6000 Quadro RTX 6000 Passive Quadro RTX 8000 Quadro RTX 8000 Passive Tesla T10 Tesla T10 16 GB Tesla T10 24 GB Tesla T40 24 GB
VS
RTX A1000 Embedded RTX A1000 Mobile RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB RTX A2000 Mobile RTX A3000 Mobile RTX A3000 Mobile 12 GB RTX A4000 Mobile RTX A4500 Mobile RTX A5000 Max-Q RTX A5000 Mobile RTX A5500 Max-Q RTX A5500 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro RTX 8000 with RTX A5500 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

RTX 8000
2018
48 GB GDDR6, 260 Watt
49.97
+11.1%

RTX 8000 outperforms RTX A5500 Mobile by a moderate 11% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

RTX 8000 RTX 8000
RTX A5500 Mobile RTX A5500 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking6077
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.87no data
Power efficiency13.4019.00
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameTU102GA103
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date13 August 2018 (6 years ago)22 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$9,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores46087424
Core clock speed1395 MHz975 MHz
Boost clock speed1770 MHz1500 MHz
Number of transistors18,600 million22,000 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)260 Watt165 Watt
Texture fill rate509.8348.0
Floating-point processing power16.31 TFLOPS22.27 TFLOPS
ROPs9696
TMUs288232
Tensor Cores576232
Ray Tracing Cores7258

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount48 GB16 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth672.0 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-CPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA7.58.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 8000 49.97
+11.1%
RTX A5500 Mobile 44.97

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 8000 19278
+11.1%
RTX A5500 Mobile 17350

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD140−150
+6.9%
131
−6.9%
1440p80−85
+5.3%
76
−5.3%
4K60−65
+7.1%
56
−7.1%

Cost per frame, $

1080p71.42no data
1440p124.99no data
4K166.65no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 129
+0%
129
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 114
+0%
114
+0%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Hitman 3 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Metro Exodus 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 88
+0%
88
+0%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Hitman 3 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Metro Exodus 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 200
+0%
200
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 76
+0%
76
+0%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Hitman 3 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 178
+0%
178
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 102
+0%
102
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 77
+0%
77
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45
+0%
45
+0%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Hitman 3 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Metro Exodus 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 129
+0%
129
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Hitman 3 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 63
+0%
63
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18
+0%
18
+0%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 68
+0%
68
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30
+0%
30
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

This is how RTX 8000 and RTX A5500 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 8000 is 7% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 8000 is 5% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 8000 is 7% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 72 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 49.97 44.97
Recency 13 August 2018 22 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount 48 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 260 Watt 165 Watt

RTX 8000 has a 11.1% higher aggregate performance score, and a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX A5500 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 50% more advanced lithography process, and 57.6% lower power consumption.

The Quadro RTX 8000 is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX A5500 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 8000 is a workstation card while RTX A5500 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
Quadro RTX 8000
NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile
RTX A5500 Mobile
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RTX 8000 Quadro RTX 8000
vs
PRO W7700 Radeon PRO W7700
RTX A5500 Mobile RTX A5500 Mobile
vs
RTX A4500 Mobile RTX A4500 Mobile
RTX 8000 Quadro RTX 8000
vs
RTX A4000 RTX A4000
RTX 8000 Quadro RTX 8000
vs
RTX 4080 GeForce RTX 4080
RTX 8000 Quadro RTX 8000
vs
RTX 4090 GeForce RTX 4090
RTX 8000 Quadro RTX 8000
vs
H100 PCIe H100 PCIe
RTX 8000 Quadro RTX 8000
vs
H100 SXM5 H100 SXM5
RTX 8000 Quadro RTX 8000
vs
RTX A5500 RTX A5500
RTX 8000 Quadro RTX 8000
vs
Arc A370M Arc A370M
RTX 8000 Quadro RTX 8000
vs
Arc A770 Arc A770
RTX 8000 Quadro RTX 8000
vs
RTX 4090 Ti GeForce RTX 4090 Ti
RTX 8000 Quadro RTX 8000
vs
RTX A1000 Mobile RTX A1000 Mobile
RTX 8000 Quadro RTX 8000
vs
RTX 6000 Ada RTX 6000 Ada

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.6 464 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 8000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 15 votes

Rate RTX A5500 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.