RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs Quadro RTX 8000

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro RTX 8000 and RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX 8000
2018
48 GB GDDR6, 260 Watt
49.97

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation outperforms RTX 8000 by a small 9% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking6046
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.88no data
Power efficiency13.4054.34
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameTU102AD104
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date13 August 2018 (6 years ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$9,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores46086144
Core clock speed1395 MHz720 MHz
Boost clock speed1770 MHz1560 MHz
Number of transistors18,600 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)260 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate509.8299.5
Floating-point processing power16.31 TFLOPS19.17 TFLOPS
ROPs9680
TMUs288192
Tensor Cores576192
Ray Tracing Cores7248

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm168 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount48 GB20 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit160 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth672.0 GB/s280.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA7.58.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 8000 49.97
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 54.55
+9.2%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 8000 19278
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 21042
+9.2%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

RTX 8000 147584
+19.9%
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 123076

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

RTX 8000 122130
+15.7%
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 105594

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 49.97 54.55
Recency 13 August 2018 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 48 GB 20 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 260 Watt 70 Watt

RTX 8000 has a 140% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation, on the other hand, has a 9.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 140% more advanced lithography process, and 271.4% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Quadro RTX 8000 and RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
Quadro RTX 8000
NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 464 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 8000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 49 votes

Rate RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.