Radeon RX 7600S vs Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

Place in the ranking	132	119
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	22.87	35.38
Architecture	Turing (2018−2022)	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code name	TU104	Navi 33
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	27 May 2019 (5 years ago)	4 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3072	1792
Core clock speed	1035 MHz	1500 MHz
Boost clock speed	1545 MHz	2200 MHz
Number of transistors	13,600 million	13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	110 Watt	75 Watt
Texture fill rate	296.6	246.4
Floating-point processing power	9.492 TFLOPS	15.77 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	64
TMUs	192	112
Tensor Cores	384	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	48	28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	large
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	448.0 GB/s	256.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	Portable Device Dependent
G-SYNC support	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3
CUDA	7.5	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 5000 Mobile 36.07

RX 7600S 38.05
+5.5%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 5000 Mobile 24620

RX 7600S 34218
+39%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RTX 5000 Mobile 54153

RX 7600S 79339
+46.5%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 5000 Mobile 23035

RX 7600S 25900
+12.4%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 5000 Mobile 117274

RX 7600S 155806
+32.9%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

RTX 5000 Mobile 9332
+1.4%

RX 7600S 9203

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	133 +29.1%	103 −29.1%
1440p	79 +58%	50 −58%
4K	49 +75%	28 −75%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

65−70
+4.7%

60−65

−4.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	104 +31.6%	75−80 −31.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	65−70 −87.9%	124 +87.9%
Battlefield 5	120−130 +4.2%	110−120 −4.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	125 +66.7%	75−80 −66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	65−70 −53.7%	103 +53.7%
Far Cry 5	80−85 +2.5%	80−85 −2.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	95−100 +3.3%	90−95 −3.3%
Forza Horizon 4	180−190 +2.2%	180−190 −2.2%
Hitman 3	80−85 +5.1%	75−80 −5.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	160−170 +3.2%	150−160 −3.2%
Metro Exodus	144 +20%	120−130 −20%
Red Dead Redemption 2	113 +28.4%	85−90 −28.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	140−150 +5.3%	130−140 −5.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	120−130 +2.4%	120−130 −2.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	80−85 +3.8%	75−80 −3.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	65−70 −54.5%	102 +54.5%
Battlefield 5	120−130 +4.2%	110−120 −4.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	118 +57.3%	75−80 −57.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	65−70 −25.4%	84 +25.4%
Far Cry 5	80−85 +2.5%	80−85 −2.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	95−100 +3.3%	90−95 −3.3%
Forza Horizon 4	180−190 +2.2%	180−190 −2.2%
Hitman 3	80−85 +5.1%	75−80 −5.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	160−170 +3.2%	150−160 −3.2%
Metro Exodus	144 +20%	120−130 −20%
Red Dead Redemption 2	99 +12.5%	85−90 −12.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	140−150 −35.7%	190 +35.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	80−85 +5.3%	75−80 −5.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	120−130 +2.4%	120−130 −2.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	73 −8.2%	75−80 +8.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	65−70 −33.3%	88 +33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	88 +17.3%	75−80 −17.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	65−70 −4.5%	70 +4.5%
Far Cry 5	80−85 +2.5%	80−85 −2.5%
Forza Horizon 4	180−190 +2.2%	180−190 −2.2%
Hitman 3	80−85 +5.1%	75−80 −5.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	160−170 +3.2%	150−160 −3.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	140−150 −16.4%	163 +16.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	100 +5.3%	95 −5.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	120−130 +82.9%	70 −82.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

108
+22.7%

85−90

−22.7%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	70−75 +5.7%	70−75 −5.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	55−60 +5.4%	55−60 −5.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	63 +57.5%	40−45 −57.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45 +5%	40−45 −5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	66 +53.5%	40−45 −53.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−33 −43.3%	43 +43.3%
Far Cry 5	40−45 +2.3%	40−45 −2.3%
Forza Horizon 4	210−220 +3.8%	200−210 −3.8%
Hitman 3	50−55 +6.4%	45−50 −6.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	80−85 +5.1%	75−80 −5.1%
Metro Exodus	70−75 +4.3%	65−70 −4.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	90−95 +5.7%	85−90 −5.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	55−60 +5.8%	50−55 −5.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	190−200 +2.7%	180−190 −2.7%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

90
+42.9%

60−65

−42.9%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 +2.7%	35−40 −2.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35 +3.2%	30−35 −3.2%
Hitman 3	30−35 +3.3%	30−33 −3.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	170−180 +2.3%	170−180 −2.3%
Metro Exodus	76 +65.2%	45−50 −65.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	71 +61.4%	40−45 −61.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40 +60%	24−27 −60%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24−27 +4.3%	21−24 −4.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	38 +65.2%	21−24 −65.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −38.5%	18 +38.5%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +4.8%	21−24 −4.8%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 +3.9%	50−55 −3.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	50−55 +4%	50−55 −4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20 +5.6%	18−20 −5.6%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

50
+56.3%

30−35

−56.3%

This is how RTX 5000 Mobile and RX 7600S compete in popular games:

RTX 5000 Mobile is 29% faster in 1080p
RTX 5000 Mobile is 58% faster in 1440p
RTX 5000 Mobile is 75% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 5000 Mobile is 83% faster.
in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 7600S is 88% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RTX 5000 Mobile is ahead in 61 test (85%)
RX 7600S is ahead in 11 tests (15%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	36.07	38.05
Recency	27 May 2019	4 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	110 Watt	75 Watt

RTX 5000 Mobile has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RX 7600S, on the other hand, has a 5.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 46.7% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile and Radeon RX 7600S.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while Radeon RX 7600S is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.