ATI Radeon 9200 LE vs Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking	146	1544
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	22.38	no data
Architecture	Turing (2018−2022)	Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code name	TU104	RV280
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Release date	27 May 2019 (5 years ago)	1 May 2003 (21 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3072	no data
Core clock speed	1035 MHz	250 MHz
Boost clock speed	1545 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	13,600 million	36 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	110 Watt	28 Watt
Texture fill rate	296.6	1.000
Floating-point processing power	9.492 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	64	4
TMUs	192	4
Tensor Cores	384	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	48	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	AGP 8x
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	DDR
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	64 MB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz	200 MHz
Memory bandwidth	448.0 GB/s	6.4 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
G-SYNC support	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

+

no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_1)	8.1
Shader Model	6.5	no data
OpenGL	4.6	1.4
OpenCL	1.2	N/A
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A
CUDA	7.5	-
DLSS	+	-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	132	no data
1440p	84	no data
4K	54	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	27 May 2019	1 May 2003
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	64 MB
Chip lithography	12 nm	150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	110 Watt	28 Watt

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---