ATI Radeon 9200 LE vs Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile with Radeon 9200 LE, including specs and performance data.

RTX 5000 Mobile
2019
16 GB GDDR6, 110 Watt
36.14
+361300%

RTX 5000 Mobile outperforms ATI 9200 LE by a whopping 361300% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1341533
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency22.540.02
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameTU104RV280
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date27 May 2019 (5 years ago)1 May 2003 (21 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3072no data
Core clock speed1035 MHz250 MHz
Boost clock speed1545 MHzno data
Number of transistors13,600 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)110 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate296.61.000
Floating-point processing power9.492 TFLOPSno data
ROPs644
TMUs1924
Tensor Cores384no data
Ray Tracing Cores48no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR
Maximum RAM amount16 GB64 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz200 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s6.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)8.1
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.61.4
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA7.5-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD133-0−1
1440p79-0−1
4K54-0−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 65−70 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 104 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70 0−1
Battlefield 5 120−130 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 125 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70 0−1
Far Cry 5 80−85 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 95−100 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 180−190 0−1
Hitman 3 80−85 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170 0−1
Metro Exodus 144 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 113 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 140−150 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130 0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 80−85 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70 0−1
Battlefield 5 120−130 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 118 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70 0−1
Far Cry 5 80−85 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 95−100 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 180−190 0−1
Hitman 3 80−85 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170 0−1
Metro Exodus 144 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 99 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 140−150 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 80−85 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130 0−1

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 73 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 88 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70 0−1
Far Cry 5 80−85 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 180−190 0−1
Hitman 3 80−85 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 140−150 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130 0−1

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 108 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 63 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 66 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33 0−1
Far Cry 5 40−45 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 210−220 0−1
Hitman 3 50−55 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85 0−1
Metro Exodus 70−75 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 90−95 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 190−200 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 90 0−1

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35 0−1
Hitman 3 30−35 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 170−180 0−1
Metro Exodus 76 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 71 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 38 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14 0−1
Far Cry 5 21−24 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 50−55 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 50 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 36.14 0.01
Recency 27 May 2019 1 May 2003
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 12 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 110 Watt 28 Watt

RTX 5000 Mobile has a 361300% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 16 years, a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1150% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9200 LE, on the other hand, has 292.9% lower power consumption.

The Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 9200 LE in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while Radeon 9200 LE is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
ATI Radeon 9200 LE
Radeon 9200 LE

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 36 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Radeon 9200 LE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.