Arc A730M vs Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile with Arc A730M, including specs and performance data.

RTX 5000 Mobile
2019
16 GB GDDR6, 110 Watt
36.14
+32.8%

RTX 5000 Mobile outperforms Arc A730M by a substantial 33% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking134203
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency22.5423.35
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameTU104DG2-512
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date27 May 2019 (5 years ago)2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores30723072
Core clock speed1035 MHz1100 MHz
Boost clock speed1545 MHz2050 MHz
Number of transistors13,600 million21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)110 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate296.6393.6
Floating-point processing power9.492 TFLOPS12.6 TFLOPS
ROPs6496
TMUs192192
Tensor Cores384384
Ray Tracing Cores4824

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB12 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s336.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 5000 Mobile 36.14
+32.8%
Arc A730M 27.22

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 5000 Mobile 24620
Arc A730M 29144
+18.4%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RTX 5000 Mobile 54153
Arc A730M 63380
+17%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 5000 Mobile 23035
+8.2%
Arc A730M 21294

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 5000 Mobile 117274
+40.6%
Arc A730M 83396

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 5000 Mobile 501167
+7.3%
Arc A730M 467230

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

RTX 5000 Mobile 9332
+5.9%
Arc A730M 8813

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD133
+82.2%
73
−82.2%
1440p79
+92.7%
41
−92.7%
4K54
+135%
23
−135%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
−6%
71
+6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 104
+38.7%
75−80
−38.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70
+3.1%
64
−3.1%
Battlefield 5 120−130
+8.8%
110−120
−8.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 125
+73.6%
70−75
−73.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+4.7%
64
−4.7%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+6.4%
75−80
−6.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 95−100
+6.7%
85−90
−6.7%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+4.4%
180−190
−4.4%
Hitman 3 80−85
+60.8%
51
−60.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
+6.6%
150−160
−6.6%
Metro Exodus 144
+24.1%
110−120
−24.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 113
+32.9%
85−90
−32.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 140−150
+10.2%
120−130
−10.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
+4.1%
120−130
−4.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 80−85
+9.3%
75−80
−9.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70
+22.2%
54
−22.2%
Battlefield 5 120−130
+8.8%
110−120
−8.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 118
+63.9%
70−75
−63.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+24.1%
54
−24.1%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+6.4%
75−80
−6.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 95−100
+6.7%
85−90
−6.7%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+4.4%
180−190
−4.4%
Hitman 3 80−85
+74.5%
47
−74.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
+6.6%
150−160
−6.6%
Metro Exodus 144
+24.1%
110−120
−24.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 99
+16.5%
85−90
−16.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 140−150
−6.4%
149
+6.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 80−85
+9.6%
70−75
−9.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
+4.1%
120−130
−4.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 73
−2.7%
75−80
+2.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70
+37.5%
48
−37.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 88
+22.2%
70−75
−22.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+28.8%
52
−28.8%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+6.4%
75−80
−6.4%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+4.4%
180−190
−4.4%
Hitman 3 80−85
+78.3%
46
−78.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
+83%
88
−83%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 140−150
+12.9%
124
−12.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100
+122%
45
−122%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
+167%
48
−167%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 108
+27.1%
85−90
−27.1%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+10.4%
65−70
−10.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
+9.3%
50−55
−9.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 63
+65.8%
35−40
−65.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+13.5%
37
−13.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 66
+61%
40−45
−61%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
−3.3%
31
+3.3%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+7.3%
40−45
−7.3%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
+7.4%
200−210
−7.4%
Hitman 3 50−55
+28.2%
39
−28.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
+25.8%
66
−25.8%
Metro Exodus 70−75
+7.5%
65−70
−7.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 90−95
+10.7%
80−85
−10.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+12.2%
45−50
−12.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 190−200
+5.6%
180−190
−5.6%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 90
+50%
60−65
−50%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+8.6%
35−40
−8.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
+10.3%
27−30
−10.3%
Hitman 3 30−35
+6.9%
27−30
−6.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 170−180
+5.9%
160−170
−5.9%
Metro Exodus 76
+72.7%
40−45
−72.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 71
+73.2%
40−45
−73.2%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40
+73.9%
21−24
−73.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 38
+72.7%
21−24
−72.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+18.2%
10−12
−18.2%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+10%
20−22
−10%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+8.2%
45−50
−8.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
−3.8%
54
+3.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
+11.8%
16−18
−11.8%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 50
+61.3%
30−35
−61.3%

This is how RTX 5000 Mobile and Arc A730M compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5000 Mobile is 82% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 5000 Mobile is 93% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 5000 Mobile is 135% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 5000 Mobile is 167% faster.
  • in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Arc A730M is 6% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 5000 Mobile is ahead in 67 tests (93%)
  • Arc A730M is ahead in 5 tests (7%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 36.14 27.22
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 110 Watt 80 Watt

RTX 5000 Mobile has a 32.8% higher aggregate performance score, and a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Arc A730M, on the other hand, has a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 37.5% lower power consumption.

The Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc A730M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while Arc A730M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
Intel Arc A730M
Arc A730M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 36 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 108 votes

Rate Arc A730M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.