Quadro P2000 Mobile vs Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile and Quadro P2000 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX 4000 Mobile
2019
8 GB GDDR6, 110 Watt
34.15
+118%

RTX 4000 Mobile outperforms P2000 Mobile by a whopping 118% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking153344
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency21.2814.35
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameTU104GP106
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date27 May 2019 (5 years ago)15 February 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25601152
Core clock speed1110 MHz1291 MHz
Boost clock speed1560 MHz1291 MHz
Number of transistors13,600 million4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)110 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate249.692.95
Floating-point processing power7.987 TFLOPS2.974 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs16072
Tensor Cores320no data
Ray Tracing Cores40no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB3.75 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s96.13 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+
VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA7.56.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 4000 Mobile 34.15
+118%
P2000 Mobile 15.70

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 4000 Mobile 25371
+202%
P2000 Mobile 8387

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RTX 4000 Mobile 56250
+70.6%
P2000 Mobile 32964

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 4000 Mobile 18849
+175%
P2000 Mobile 6847

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 4000 Mobile 119052
+173%
P2000 Mobile 43566

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 4000 Mobile 445161
+27.1%
P2000 Mobile 350317

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

RTX 4000 Mobile 7284
+256%
P2000 Mobile 2046

SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase

RTX 4000 Mobile 98
+220%
P2000 Mobile 31

SPECviewperf 12 - Maya

This part of SPECviewperf 12 workstation benchmark uses Autodesk Maya 13 engine to render a superhero energy plant static scene consisting of more than 700 thousand polygons, in six different modes.

RTX 4000 Mobile 144
+141%
P2000 Mobile 60

SPECviewperf 12 - Catia

RTX 4000 Mobile 162
+131%
P2000 Mobile 70

SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks

RTX 4000 Mobile 149
+43.5%
P2000 Mobile 104

SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX

RTX 4000 Mobile 186
+179%
P2000 Mobile 67

SPECviewperf 12 - Creo

RTX 4000 Mobile 141
+116%
P2000 Mobile 65

SPECviewperf 12 - Medical

RTX 4000 Mobile 62
+171%
P2000 Mobile 23

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD111
+122%
50−55
−122%
1440p63
+133%
27−30
−133%
4K48
+129%
21−24
−129%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+129%
24−27
−129%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 87
+149%
35−40
−149%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55−60
+133%
24−27
−133%
Battlefield 5 100−110
+133%
45−50
−133%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
+120%
30−33
−120%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+129%
24−27
−129%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+140%
30−33
−140%
Far Cry New Dawn 125
+127%
55−60
−127%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+129%
75−80
−129%
Hitman 3 65−70
+127%
30−33
−127%
Horizon Zero Dawn 140−150
+135%
60−65
−135%
Metro Exodus 100−110
+140%
45−50
−140%
Red Dead Redemption 2 80−85
+129%
35−40
−129%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 180
+125%
80−85
−125%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
+136%
50−55
−136%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 65−70
+130%
30−33
−130%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55−60
+133%
24−27
−133%
Battlefield 5 100−110
+133%
45−50
−133%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
+120%
30−33
−120%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+129%
24−27
−129%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+140%
30−33
−140%
Far Cry New Dawn 90
+125%
40−45
−125%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+129%
75−80
−129%
Hitman 3 65−70
+127%
30−33
−127%
Horizon Zero Dawn 140−150
+135%
60−65
−135%
Metro Exodus 100−110
+140%
45−50
−140%
Red Dead Redemption 2 80−85
+129%
35−40
−129%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 110−120
+128%
50−55
−128%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+127%
30−33
−127%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
+136%
50−55
−136%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 54
+125%
24−27
−125%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55−60
+133%
24−27
−133%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
+120%
30−33
−120%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+129%
24−27
−129%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+140%
30−33
−140%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+129%
75−80
−129%
Hitman 3 65−70
+127%
30−33
−127%
Horizon Zero Dawn 121
+120%
55−60
−120%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 110−120
+128%
50−55
−128%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75
+150%
30−33
−150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
+136%
50−55
−136%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 80−85
+129%
35−40
−129%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+126%
27−30
−126%
Far Cry New Dawn 60
+122%
27−30
−122%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 41
+128%
18−20
−128%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+143%
14−16
−143%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+138%
16−18
−138%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+130%
10−11
−130%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+131%
16−18
−131%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+119%
85−90
−119%
Hitman 3 40−45
+122%
18−20
−122%
Horizon Zero Dawn 89
+123%
40−45
−123%
Metro Exodus 77
+120%
35−40
−120%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 75−80
+150%
30−33
−150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+144%
18−20
−144%
Watch Dogs: Legion 170−180
+127%
75−80
−127%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
+129%
24−27
−129%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+129%
14−16
−129%
Far Cry New Dawn 33
+136%
14−16
−136%
Hitman 3 24−27
+160%
10−11
−160%
Horizon Zero Dawn 150−160
+127%
70−75
−127%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+144%
16−18
−144%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 51
+143%
21−24
−143%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 28
+133%
12−14
−133%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
+138%
8−9
−138%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+122%
9−10
−122%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+125%
8−9
−125%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+144%
18−20
−144%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+133%
18−20
−133%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
+150%
6−7
−150%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+133%
12−14
−133%

This is how RTX 4000 Mobile and P2000 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4000 Mobile is 122% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4000 Mobile is 133% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4000 Mobile is 129% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 34.15 15.70
Recency 27 May 2019 15 February 2019
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 3.75 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 110 Watt 75 Watt

RTX 4000 Mobile has a 117.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 months, a 113.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 33.3% more advanced lithography process.

P2000 Mobile, on the other hand, has 46.7% lower power consumption.

The Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P2000 Mobile in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile
Quadro P2000 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 30 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 110 votes

Rate Quadro P2000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.