Radeon Pro 5300M vs Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile

Place in performance ranking	191	322
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	6.44	3.76
Architecture	Turing (2018−2021)	Navi / RDNA (2019−2020)
GPU code name	N19E-Q1	Navi 14
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	27 May 2019 (5 years ago)	13 November 2019 (4 years ago)
Current price	$2393	$2068

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 3000 Mobile has 71% better value for money than Pro 5300M.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1920	1280
Core clock speed	945 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1380 MHz	1250 MHz
Number of transistors	10,800 million	6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	80 Watt	65 Watt
Texture fill rate	198.7	100.0

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile and Radeon Pro 5300M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz	12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	448.0 GB/s	192.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
G-SYNC support	+	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.5	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
CUDA	7.5	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3000 Mobile 26.20
+69.6%

Pro 5300M 15.45

Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile outperforms Radeon Pro 5300M by 70% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RTX 3000 Mobile 10116
+69.6%

Pro 5300M 5966

Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile outperforms Radeon Pro 5300M by 70% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	97 +76.4%	55−60 −76.4%
4K	88 +76%	50−55 −76%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

40−45

no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	77	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	45−50	no data
Battlefield 5	85−90	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45	no data
Far Cry 5	60−65	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	65−70	no data
Forza Horizon 4	110−120	no data
Hitman 3	50−55	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	100−110	no data
Metro Exodus	80−85	no data
Red Dead Redemption 2	65−70	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	90−95	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	70−75	no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	62	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	45−50	no data
Battlefield 5	85−90	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45	no data
Far Cry 5	60−65	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	65−70	no data
Forza Horizon 4	110−120	no data
Hitman 3	50−55	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	100−110	no data
Metro Exodus	43	no data
Red Dead Redemption 2	65−70	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	90−95	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	109	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	70−75	no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	39	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	45−50	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45	no data
Far Cry 5	60−65	no data
Forza Horizon 4	110−120	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	100−110	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	90−95	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	56	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	70−75	no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

65−70

no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	50−55	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	55−60	no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24−27	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18	no data
Far Cry 5	45−50	no data
Forza Horizon 4	50−55	no data
Hitman 3	30−35	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55	no data
Metro Exodus	50−55	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	55−60	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	20−22	no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

40−45

no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24	no data
Hitman 3	21−24	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−33	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18−20	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30	no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16−18	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8	no data
Far Cry 5	14−16	no data
Forza Horizon 4	35−40	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−33	no data
Metro Exodus	24−27	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	12−14	no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

21−24

no data

This is how RTX 3000 Mobile and Pro 5300M compete in popular games:

RTX 3000 Mobile is 76% faster in 1080p
RTX 3000 Mobile is 76% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	26.20	15.45
Recency	27 May 2019	13 November 2019
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	80 Watt	65 Watt