GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile vs Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q with GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

RTX 3000 Max-Q
2019
6 GB GDDR6, 60 Watt
21.59

RTX 3050 Mobile outperforms RTX 3000 Max-Q by a moderate 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking256237
Place by popularitynot in top-10044
Power efficiency24.6621.64
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameTU106GA107
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date27 May 2019 (5 years ago)11 May 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23042048
Core clock speed600 MHz712 MHz
Boost clock speed1215 MHz1057 MHz
Number of transistors10,800 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate175.067.65
Floating-point processing power5.599 TFLOPS4.329 TFLOPS
ROPs6440
TMUs14464
Tensor Cores28864
Ray Tracing Cores3616

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA7.58.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3000 Max-Q 21.59
RTX 3050 Mobile 23.68
+9.7%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 3000 Max-Q 8317
RTX 3050 Mobile 9122
+9.7%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 3000 Max-Q 17523
RTX 3050 Mobile 21358
+21.9%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 3000 Max-Q 13617
RTX 3050 Mobile 15685
+15.2%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 3000 Max-Q 66284
RTX 3050 Mobile 90224
+36.1%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

RTX 3000 Max-Q 62
RTX 3050 Mobile 148
+140%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

RTX 3000 Max-Q 110
+86%
RTX 3050 Mobile 59

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

RTX 3000 Max-Q 97
+1174%
RTX 3050 Mobile 8

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

RTX 3000 Max-Q 105
+89.9%
RTX 3050 Mobile 55

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

RTX 3000 Max-Q 110
+145%
RTX 3050 Mobile 45

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01

RTX 3000 Max-Q 44
+22.7%
RTX 3050 Mobile 36

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01

RTX 3000 Max-Q 71
RTX 3050 Mobile 77
+9.1%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01

RTX 3000 Max-Q 11
+47.2%
RTX 3050 Mobile 7

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD74
−25.7%
93
+25.7%
1440p46
−8.7%
50
+8.7%
4K32
−3.1%
33
+3.1%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−212%
106
+212%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
−10.6%
50−55
+10.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60
−25%
75
+25%
Battlefield 5 70−75
−11.4%
75−80
+11.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65
+35.4%
45−50
−35.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−144%
83
+144%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−10%
55−60
+10%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
−8.8%
60−65
+8.8%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
−7.7%
140−150
+7.7%
Hitman 3 88
+87.2%
45−50
−87.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−110
−7.8%
110−120
+7.8%
Metro Exodus 70−75
−9.5%
80−85
+9.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 77
+24.2%
60−65
−24.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 70−75
−12.7%
80−85
+12.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 95−100
−5.3%
100−105
+5.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
−10.6%
50−55
+10.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 50
−24%
62
+24%
Battlefield 5 70−75
−11.4%
75−80
+11.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 59
+22.9%
45−50
−22.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−79.4%
61
+79.4%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−10%
55−60
+10%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
−8.8%
60−65
+8.8%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
−7.7%
140−150
+7.7%
Hitman 3 66
+40.4%
45−50
−40.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−110
−7.8%
110−120
+7.8%
Metro Exodus 70−75
−9.5%
80−85
+9.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 67
+8.1%
60−65
−8.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 70−75
−73.2%
123
+73.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
−8.5%
50−55
+8.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 95−100
−5.3%
100−105
+5.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
−10.6%
50−55
+10.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 44
−20.5%
53
+20.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45
−6.7%
45−50
+6.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−79.4%
61
+79.4%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−10%
55−60
+10%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
−7.7%
140−150
+7.7%
Hitman 3 59
+25.5%
45−50
−25.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−110
−4.9%
107
+4.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 70−75
−49.3%
106
+49.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 52
−25%
65
+25%
Watch Dogs: Legion 33
−115%
71
+115%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 66
+6.5%
60−65
−6.5%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
−9.8%
45−50
+9.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
−9.1%
35−40
+9.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−9.1%
24−27
+9.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 20−22
−100%
40
+100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 32
+18.5%
27−30
−18.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−131%
30
+131%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−8%
27−30
+8%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
−11.7%
130−140
+11.7%
Hitman 3 24−27
−12%
27−30
+12%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−77.3%
78
+77.3%
Metro Exodus 40−45
−72.5%
69
+72.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
−73.3%
78
+73.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−16%
27−30
+16%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
−8%
130−140
+8%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 47
+20.5%
35−40
−20.5%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
−9.5%
21−24
+9.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
Hitman 3 24
−41.7%
34
+41.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
−9.9%
120−130
+9.9%
Metro Exodus 21−24
−13%
24−27
+13%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 34
−29.4%
44
+29.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−7.7%
14−16
+7.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 19
−26.3%
24
+26.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16
+23.1%
12−14
−23.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−140%
12
+140%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−8.3%
12−14
+8.3%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−10.3%
30−35
+10.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
−80%
45
+80%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12
−58.3%
19
+58.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%

This is how RTX 3000 Max-Q and RTX 3050 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3050 Mobile is 26% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3050 Mobile is 9% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3050 Mobile is 3% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Hitman 3, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 3000 Max-Q is 87% faster.
  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the RTX 3050 Mobile is 212% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 3000 Max-Q is ahead in 12 tests (17%)
  • RTX 3050 Mobile is ahead in 60 tests (83%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 21.59 23.68
Recency 27 May 2019 11 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 75 Watt

RTX 3000 Max-Q has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 25% lower power consumption.

RTX 3050 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 9.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 50% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q and GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation card while GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 50 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 4618 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.