Both graphics cards satisfy 80% minimum and 66% recommended requirements of all games known to us.
T400 4 GB vs Quadro P620
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Quadro P620 and T400 4 GB, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Quadro P620
2018
2 GB GDDR5, 40 Watt
8.83
T400 4 GB
2021
4 GB GDDR6, 30 Watt
9.09
+2.9%
T400 4 GB outperforms P620 by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Share:
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 523 | 516 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 16.96 | 23.28 |
| Architecture | Pascal (2016−2021) | Turing (2018−2022) |
| GPU code name | GP107 | TU117 |
| Market segment | Workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 February 2018 (7 years ago) | 6 May 2021 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 512 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 1177 MHz | 420 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1443 MHz | 1425 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 3,300 million | 4,700 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 46.18 | 34.20 |
| Floating-point processing power | 1.478 TFLOPS | 1.094 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 384 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1024 KB | 1024 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 145 mm | no data |
| Width | IGP | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1502 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 96.13 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 3x mini-DisplayPort |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.6 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2 |
| CUDA | 6.1 | 7.5 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
- Passmark
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 47
+4.4%
| 45−50
−4.4%
|
FPS performance in popular games
- Full HD
Low - Full HD
Medium - Full HD
High - Full HD
Ultra - Full HD
Epic - 1440p
High - 1440p
Ultra - 1440p
Epic - 4K
High - 4K
Ultra - 4K
Epic
| Counter-Strike 2 | 45−50
+4.4%
|
45−50
−4.4%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 45−50
+4.4%
|
45−50
−4.4%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 35−40
+2.9%
|
35−40
−2.9%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 27−30
+7.4%
|
27−30
−7.4%
|
| Fortnite | 113
+2.7%
|
110−120
−2.7%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
−2.6%
|
40−45
+2.6%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−35
+6.7%
|
30−33
−6.7%
|
| Valorant | 85−90
−2.3%
|
90−95
+2.3%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 45−50
+4.4%
|
45−50
−4.4%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 130−140
−1.4%
|
140−150
+1.4%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
| Dota 2 | 90
+0%
|
90−95
+0%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 35−40
+2.9%
|
35−40
−2.9%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 27−30
+7.4%
|
27−30
−7.4%
|
| Fortnite | 42
+5%
|
40−45
−5%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
−2.6%
|
40−45
+2.6%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 30−35
+10%
|
30−33
−10%
|
| Metro Exodus | 17
+6.3%
|
16−18
−6.3%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−35
+6.7%
|
30−33
−6.7%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 32
+6.7%
|
30−33
−6.7%
|
| Valorant | 85−90
−2.3%
|
90−95
+2.3%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
| Dota 2 | 83
−2.4%
|
85−90
+2.4%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 35−40
+2.9%
|
35−40
−2.9%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 27−30
+7.4%
|
27−30
−7.4%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
−2.6%
|
40−45
+2.6%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−35
+6.7%
|
30−33
−6.7%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 17
+6.3%
|
16−18
−6.3%
|
| Valorant | 85−90
−2.3%
|
90−95
+2.3%
|
| Fortnite | 29
+7.4%
|
27−30
−7.4%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 16−18
+6.3%
|
16−18
−6.3%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 65−70
−1.4%
|
70−75
+1.4%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 45−50
+4.4%
|
45−50
−4.4%
|
| Valorant | 100−105
+0%
|
100−105
+0%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 16−18
+6.3%
|
16−18
−6.3%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 18−20
+5.6%
|
18−20
−5.6%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 18−20
+5.6%
|
18−20
−5.6%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 20−22
+11.1%
|
18−20
−11.1%
|
| Metro Exodus | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
| Valorant | 45−50
+4.4%
|
45−50
−4.4%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
| Dota 2 | 30−35
+10%
|
30−33
−10%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 14−16
+7.1%
|
14−16
−7.1%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
This is how Quadro P620 and T400 4 GB compete in popular games:
- Quadro P620 is 4% faster in 1080p
Select a game to check Quadro P620 and T400 4 GB in:
Official system requirements
Reviewed graphics cards performance compared to Fortnite system requirements.
Quadro P620
T400 4 GB
+2.9%
Fortnite FPS calculator
Average frames per second in Fortnite with Quadro P620 and T400 4 GB (according to our approximations). Frames per second may vary depending on operating system and other factors.
low / 720p
184
+21.1%
low / 720p
150−160
−21.1%
medium / 1080p
113
+21.5%
medium / 1080p
90−95
−21.5%
high / 1080p
42
−7.1%
high / 1080p
45−50
+7.1%
ultra / 1080p
29
−17.2%
ultra / 1080p
30−35
+17.2%
QHD / 1440p
18−20
+0%
QHD / 1440p
18−20
+0%
4K / 2160p
8−9
−12.5%
4K / 2160p
9−10
+12.5%
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 8.83 | 9.09 |
| Recency | 1 February 2018 | 6 May 2021 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | 30 Watt |
T400 4 GB has a 2.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 33.3% lower power consumption.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Quadro P620 and T400 4 GB.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
