Radeon RX Vega M GH vs Quadro P6000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
P102-100 P104-100 P106-090 P106-100 P400 P2000 P2200 P4000 P5000 Tesla P4 Tesla P40 Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
540X 630 E9173 PCIe RX 540 RX 550 Mobile RX 550X Mobile RX 560 Mobile RX 560X Mobile RX 580 Mobile RX 640 RX Vega M GH RX Vega M GL

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P6000 with Radeon RX Vega M GH, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P6000
2016, $5,999
24 GB 384-bit, 250 Watt
37.20
+137%

P6000 outperforms M GH by a whopping 137% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
RX Vega M GH RX Vega M GH

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking142376
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.73no data
Power efficiency11.4612.07
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameGP102Polaris 22
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date1 October 2016 (9 years ago)1 February 2018 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$5,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38401536
Core clock speed1506 MHz1063 MHz
Boost clock speed1645 MHz1190 MHz
Number of transistors11,800 million5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate394.8114.2
Floating-point processing power12.63 TFLOPS3.656 TFLOPS
ROPs9664
TMUs24096
L1 Cache1.4 MB384 KB
L2 Cache3 MB1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Length267 mmno data
Width2" (5.1 cm)no data
Supplementary power connectors1 x 8-pinno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type384 BitHBM2
Maximum RAM amount24 GB4 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit1024 Bit
Memory clock speed1127 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 432 GB/s204.8 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x DisplayPortNo outputs
Number of simultaneous displays4no data
Multi-display synchronizationQuadro Sync IIno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

ECC (Error Correcting Code)+no data
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
High-Performance Video I/O6+no data
nView Desktop Management+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (12_0)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro P6000 37.20
+137%
RX Vega M GH 15.67

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P6000 15468
+136%
Samples: 184
RX Vega M GH 6550
Samples: 411

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD140−150
+137%
59
−137%
1440p90−95
+137%
38
−137%
4K65−70
+132%
28
−132%

Cost per frame, $

1080p42.85no data
1440p66.66no data
4K92.29no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 39
+0%
39
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 81
+0%
81
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30
+0%
30
+0%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Fortnite 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 47
+0%
47
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 66
+0%
66
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 23
+0%
23
+0%
Dota 2 108
+0%
108
+0%
Far Cry 5 51
+0%
51
+0%
Fortnite 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 35
+0%
35
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 60
+0%
60
+0%
Metro Exodus 32
+0%
32
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60
+0%
60
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 60
+0%
60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 23
+0%
23
+0%
Dota 2 95
+0%
95
+0%
Far Cry 5 47
+0%
47
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 34
+0%
34
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Valorant 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 43
+0%
43
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4
+0%
4
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Metro Exodus 11
+0%
11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Valorant 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 21
+0%
21
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Dota 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

This is how Quadro P6000 and RX Vega M GH compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P6000 is 137% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro P6000 is 137% faster in 1440p
  • Quadro P6000 is 132% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 60 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 37.20 15.67
Recency 1 October 2016 1 February 2018
Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 100 Watt

Quadro P6000 has a 137% higher aggregate performance score, and a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RX Vega M GH, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 14% more advanced lithography process, and 150% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P6000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega M GH in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P6000 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX Vega M GH is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
vs
Pro V620 Radeon Pro V620
RX Vega M GH Radeon RX Vega M GH
vs
GTX 965M SLI GeForce GTX 965M SLI
Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
vs
RTX 5000 Quadro RTX 5000
Quadro P2000 Quadro P2000
vs
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
M3000 SE Quadro M3000 SE
vs
GTX 1060 6 GB GP104 GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB GP104
M3000 SE Quadro M3000 SE
vs
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
vs
GTX TITAN GeForce GTX TITAN
Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
vs
7900 GX2 GeForce 7900 GX2
Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
vs
Apple M2 Max 30-Core GPU M2 Max 30-Core GPU
Tesla P4 Tesla P4
vs
Quadro Quadro
Tesla P4 Tesla P4
vs
GRID M60-1Q GRID M60-1Q
Tesla P4 Tesla P4
vs
RX 570G Radeon RX 570G
Tesla P4 Tesla P4
vs
A100 SXM4 80 GB A100 SXM4 80 GB

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7 120 votes

Rate Quadro P6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 51 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M GH on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P6000 or Radeon RX Vega M GH, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.