Radeon RX 6600 vs Quadro P6000

Place in performance ranking	103	102
Place by popularity	not in top-100	14
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	19.51	35.08
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Navi / RDNA2 (2020−2022)
GPU code name	GP102	Navi 23
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	1 October 2016 (7 years ago)	13 October 2021 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$5,999	$329
Current price	$989 (0.2x MSRP)	$358 (1.1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 6600 has 80% better value for money than Quadro P6000.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3840	1792
Core clock speed	1506 MHz	2044 MHz
Boost clock speed	1645 MHz	2491 MHz
Number of transistors	11,800 million	11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	132 Watt
Texture fill rate	394.8	279.0
Floating-point performance	12,634 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	267 mm	190 mm
Width	2" (5.1 cm)	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1 x 8-pin	1x 8-pin
SLI options	+	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	384 Bit	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	24 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	9016 MHz	14500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	Up to 432 GB/s	224.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	DVI-D DP DP DP DP 3-pin Stereo	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
Number of simultaneous displays	4	no data
Multi-display synchronization	Quadro Sync II	no data
HDMI	no data	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

ECC (Error Correcting Code)	+	no data
3D Vision Pro	+	no data
Mosaic	+	no data
High-Performance Video I/O6	+	no data
nView Desktop Management	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	12.0 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.5
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.1
Vulkan	+	1.2
CUDA	6.1	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P6000 39.18

RX 6600 39.19
+0%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro P6000 15132

RX 6600 15133
+0%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	100−110 −9%	109 +9%
1440p	55−60 −3.6%	57 +3.6%
4K	30−35 −3.3%	31 +3.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

100−105

−7%

107
+7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	65−70 −6.2%	65−70 +6.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	110−120 −2.7%	113 +2.7%
Battlefield 5	120−130 −5%	120−130 +5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	75−80 −5.3%	75−80 +5.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	90−95 −1.1%	91 +1.1%
Far Cry 5	80−85 −6.3%	85−90 +6.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	95−100 −2.1%	95−100 +2.1%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 −6.4%	140−150 +6.4%
Hitman 3	95−100 −4.2%	99 +4.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	260−270 −2.3%	266 +2.3%
Metro Exodus	110−120 −1.8%	110−120 +1.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	90−95 −4.4%	90−95 +4.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	220−230 −2.3%	225 +2.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	100−105 −5%	105 +5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	65−70 −6.2%	65−70 +6.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	90−95 −2.2%	92 +2.2%
Battlefield 5	120−130 −5%	120−130 +5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	75−80 −5.3%	75−80 +5.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	70−75 −4.3%	73 +4.3%
Far Cry 5	80−85 −6.3%	85−90 +6.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	95−100 −2.1%	95−100 +2.1%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 −6.4%	140−150 +6.4%
Hitman 3	90−95 −4.4%	94 +4.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	150−160 −6%	150−160 +6%
Metro Exodus	65−70 −3.1%	67 +3.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	90−95 −4.4%	90−95 +4.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	180−190 −1.1%	182 +1.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	140−150 −5%	147 +5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	95−100 −2.1%	95−100 +2.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	65−70 −6.2%	65−70 +6.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	75−80 −4%	78 +4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	75−80 −5.3%	75−80 +5.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	55−60 −7.3%	59 +7.3%
Far Cry 5	80−85 −6.3%	85−90 +6.3%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 −6.4%	140−150 +6.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	140−150 −1.4%	142 +1.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	150−160 −4.7%	157 +4.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	85−90 −5.9%	90 +5.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 −5.5%	58 +5.5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

90−95

−4.4%

90−95
+4.4%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	70−75 −7.1%	75−80 +7.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	90−95 −1.1%	90−95 +1.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 −5%	40−45 +5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	50−55 −4%	52 +4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	55−60 −9.1%	60−65 +9.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−33 −13.3%	34 +13.3%
Far Cry 5	90−95 −1.1%	91 +1.1%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 −2.5%	80−85 +2.5%
Hitman 3	50−55 −8%	54 +8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	100−105 −2%	102 +2%
Metro Exodus	95−100 −2.1%	97 +2.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	100−105 −1%	101 +1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	55−60 −3.6%	55−60 +3.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 −2.5%	41 +2.5%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

65−70

−3.1%

65−70
+3.1%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 −11.4%	35−40 +11.4%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−33 −10%	30−35 +10%
Hitman 3	35−40 −2.9%	36 +2.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 −11.1%	50−55 +11.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−33 −10%	33 +10%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40−45 −10%	44 +10%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 −12.5%	27−30 +12.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 −14.3%	24 +14.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 −4.2%	24−27 +4.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −16.7%	14 +16.7%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −9.5%	21−24 +9.5%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 −8%	50−55 +8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 −10%	55 +10%
Metro Exodus	45−50 −6.7%	48 +6.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20 −16.7%	21 +16.7%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

30−33

−16.7%

35−40
+16.7%

This is how Quadro P6000 and RX 6600 compete in popular games:

RX 6600 is 9% faster in 1080p
RX 6600 is 4% faster in 1440p
RX 6600 is 3% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	39.18	39.19
Recency	1 October 2016	13 October 2021
Cost	$5999	$329
Maximum RAM amount	24 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	16 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	132 Watt